Feature #5081
Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8
0%
IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1/7-4 Ed2.1 Annex B/7-500
Description
Add a statement about the intention of the L/R concept. Specify whether the L/R concept is applicable for the control of switchgear exclusively, not for controls in general. Note the saying "if the LN class includes 'Loc' and 'LocSta' data, then this LN class falls under L/R". Applicable for
{ANCR, ARIS, ATCC, AVCO, CCGR, CSWI, CSYN, FSPT, GAPC, GGIO, IHMI, ITCI, KFAN, KFIL, KPMP, KVLV, LLN0, RSYN, XCBR, XSWI, YEFN, YLTC, YPSH, ZRRC}
Within such an LN class, clarify/list the controllable objects which fall under the L/R concept, e.g. 'XCBR.Pos' - yes, 'XCBR.OpCntRs' - no
Proposal descriptions
WG 10 needs to decide which task force needs to take a look at all the parts and determine the best approach as to where the clarification(s) needs to be made.
H30 to provide more use cases from users.
Related to TISSUE #1728.
There are no sufficient information in Standard for user to specify L/R concept in their specifications.
Related issues