Feature #5087: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 7/8 - IEC 61850 User Feedback Task Force - UCAIug Issue Tracking System

Feature #5087

Clarifications on the local/remote concept 7/8

Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 2 years ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:

Resolved

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Tom Berry

Category:

Standard clarification required

Start date:

09/20/2021

Due date:

% Done:

Estimated time:

ID:

Source:

TF Unique ID:

11 # MH

WG10 Proposal:

Estimated Completion:

Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:

To discuss in WG10:

Short Proposal:

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-4 Ed2.1 ,7-5

Needs More Information:

Assigned TF:

Description

Add a statement in the description text of 'MltLev' that this setting effects all contained LN instances of that LD.
Is the dependency of 'MltLev' limited to contained LN instances of that LD or, in the case of nested LD, including also subordinate levels?

Related issues

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago

Related to Feature #5081: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8 added

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago

Status changed from New to In Progress

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago

Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No

Updated by Tom Berry about 2 years ago

Draft proposal
When there are nested logical devices, the control service checks for local/remote should be similar to the checks for Mod/Beh.

When a control request is received at a Logical Node, the checks should take into account the status of the Loc, LocSta, MltLev data objects of the logical node, and also the Loc, LocSta, MltLev data objects of the LLN0 for all containing logical devices.
In the case of different values, "Loc=true", "LocSta=true", "MltLev=False" are dominant.