Feature #5087
Clarifications on the local/remote concept 7/8
Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago.
Updated about 1 year ago.
Category:
Standard clarification required
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Description
Add a statement in the description text of 'MltLev' that this setting effects all contained LN instances of that LD.
Is the dependency of 'MltLev' limited to contained LN instances of that LD or, in the case of nested LD, including also subordinate levels?
- Related to Feature #5081: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8 added
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Draft proposal
When there are nested logical devices, the control service checks for local/remote should be similar to the checks for Mod/Beh.
When a control request is received at a Logical Node, the checks should take into account the status of the Loc, LocSta, MltLev data objects of the logical node, and also the Loc, LocSta, MltLev data objects of the LLN0 for all containing logical devices.
In the case of different values, "Loc=true", "LocSta=true", "MltLev=False" are dominant.
- Assignee set to Tom Berry
- Standard(s) changed from IEC 618507-4 Ed2.1 to IEC 61850-7-4 Ed2.1 ,7-5
Also available in: Atom
PDF