Feature #5081
Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8
0%
IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1/7-4 Ed2.1 Annex B/7-500
Description
Add a statement about the intention of the L/R concept. Specify whether the L/R concept is applicable for the control of switchgear exclusively, not for controls in general. Note the saying "if the LN class includes 'Loc' and 'LocSta' data, then this LN class falls under L/R". Applicable for
{ANCR, ARIS, ATCC, AVCO, CCGR, CSWI, CSYN, FSPT, GAPC, GGIO, IHMI, ITCI, KFAN, KFIL, KPMP, KVLV, LLN0, RSYN, XCBR, XSWI, YEFN, YLTC, YPSH, ZRRC}
Within such an LN class, clarify/list the controllable objects which fall under the L/R concept, e.g. 'XCBR.Pos' - yes, 'XCBR.OpCntRs' - no
Proposal descriptions
WG 10 needs to decide which task force needs to take a look at all the parts and determine the best approach as to where the clarification(s) needs to be made.
H30 to provide more use cases from users.
Related to TISSUE #1728.
There are no sufficient information in Standard for user to specify L/R concept in their specifications.
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 2 years ago
From the point of view of the application perspective we need to know what users expect to manage L/R in each logical node? Does it apply to all controllable data objects?
Action item:
- Ask users what is the expected behaviour?
- Ask K.P.B. what was the original concept of L/R?
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Contact K.P.B. to ask him about the original concept of L/R.
We need to clarify which controllable objects are under L/R (Loc) concept of a LN class.
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5084: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 4/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5082: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 2/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5083: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 3/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5085: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 5/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5086: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 6/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5087: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 7/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5088: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 8/8 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
- To discuss in WG10 changed from No to Yes
- Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1 to IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1/7-4 Ed2.1 Annex B/7-500
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 2 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
The eighth local/remote issues will be addressed by 7-5/7-500 Task Force.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 12 months ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 11 months ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Updated by Vladan Cvejic 11 months ago
- Copied to IEC61850-7-5 #6378: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8 added