Project

General

Profile

Feature #5083

Clarifications on the local/remote concept 3/8

Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago. Updated 12 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
09/20/2021
Due date:
03/20/2022 (about 10 months late)
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
7
Source:
MH
TF Unique ID:
7 # MH
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

Include a statement

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1,7-5

Needs More Information:

Description

Add a statement about the use of XCBR.Loc (and similar LN classes). Assume XCBR.Loc="true". Will protection trips and switchgear controls by GAPC be rejected?


Proposal descriptions

Not affected by Loc DO:
- Protection trips are not affected by Loc data object.
- GAPC.Op (will go through) --> PTRC.Tr (to trip) --> XCBR

Otherwise, they are affected by Loc DO (control model)
- GAPC SPC/DPC/APC controllable objects will be affected by Loc data object.

The proposal is to include a statement about this behaviour in 7-1. There is a section about local/remote in 7-1, maybe it is the good place for that.


Related issues

Related to IEC 61850 User Feedback Task Force - Feature #5081: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8ResolvedTom Berry09/20/2021

Actions
#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Due date set to 03/20/2022
  • To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
  • Short Proposal set to Include a statement
#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
#4

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 12 months ago

  • Related to Feature #5084: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 4/8 added
#5

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 12 months ago

  • Related to deleted (Feature #5084: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 4/8)
#6

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 12 months ago

  • Related to Feature #5081: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8 added
#7

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 12 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
#8

Updated by Tom Berry 12 months ago

Proposed clarification

Trip signals e.g. communicated by GOOSE are not affected by Loc.
This includes trip signals direct from protection logical nodes or PTRC.
A GAPC.Op status routed as an input to PTRC will not be affected by Loc.

When GAPC or any other logical node uses control services to activate SPC/DPC/INC/ENC/APC controllable objects in a destination logical node, then these commands may be affected by the local/remote status of the destination logical node and containing logical device(s).

See Feature #5082

#9

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 12 months ago

  • Assignee set to Tom Berry
#10

Updated by Tom Berry 12 months ago

  • Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1 to IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1,7-5

Also available in: Atom PDF