Feature #5085
Clarifications on the local/remote concept 5/8
0%
IEC 61850 7-1 / 7-4 Ed2.1,7-5
Description
Add a statement about the dependency of 'LN.Loc' contained in LD from LD/LLN0.Loc (and LocSta, as applicable). Is this dependency limited to contained LN instances of that LD or, in the case of nested LD, including also subordinate levels? (see Tissue 1778)
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 10 months ago
- Due date set to 03/20/2022
- To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
Updated by Vladan Cvejic 6 months ago
- Related to Feature #5081: Clarifications on the local/remote concept 1/8 added
Updated by Tom Berry 6 months ago
Draft proposal
When there are nested logical devices, the control service checks for local/remote should be similar to the checks for Mod/Beh.
When a control request is received at a Logical Node, the checks should take into account the status of the Loc, LocSta, MltLev data objects of the logical node, and also the Loc, LocSta, MltLev data objects of the LLN0 for all containing logical devices.
In the case of different values, "Loc=true", "LocSta=true", "MltLev=False" are dominant.