Project

General

Profile

Issues #6617

tIieN1 - can a popup warning be considered as 'not allowed'

Added by Richard Schimmel about 1 year ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Due date:
12/10/2024 (11 days late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
6
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

I see ICT tools that also provide some SCT features. Such tools may have a setting to allow or block SCT features. For example when SCT features are blocked the data model can't change and tIieN1 will pass. When the setting allows SCT features the tIieN1 will fail. So the test result depends on a setting. Which is very common for server testing and allowed.
Now what if an ICT tool does not have such setting but instead pop-ups with a warning and ask the engineer something like "dataobject/LN is allocated to a client. are you sure to remove?". Is this acceptable to pass the test?


Files

#1

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 year ago

  • Due date set to 01/09/2024
  • Status changed from New to Resolved

Many tools on the market provide some mix of ICT and SCT function. UCA needs to address these products.

Richard to review and propose resolution.

#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 5 months ago

  • Due date changed from 01/09/2024 to 09/03/2024
  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Any implementation that prevents changing of data model in the output SCL is acceptable.

#3

Updated by Zach Wormgoor 4 months ago

Attached is a detailed proposal to allow flexibility for ICTs, with the intent of better user experience and better engineering workflow.

#4

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 4 months ago

  • Due date changed from 09/03/2024 to 09/17/2024

Generally accept proposal, but further discussion of SED/Exchange between 2 SCTs needs further discussion.

#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 3 months ago

  • Due date changed from 09/17/2024 to 10/29/2024
#6

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 2 months ago

  • Due date changed from 10/29/2024 to 11/12/2024
  • Assignee changed from Richard Schimmel to Camille Bloch

This needs to be reviewed in context of engineering process. Thierry and Camille to discuss.

#7

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 month ago

  • Due date changed from 11/12/2024 to 12/10/2024

Also available in: Atom PDF