Project

General

Profile

Issues #6268

sCtl5 step 6 and step10 expected result does not apply to control objects without physical output

Added by Hua Qin almost 2 years ago. Updated 10 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Ursula Kramarczyk
Due date:
05/02/2023
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
ED2.1 TP1.2
Updated Test Document:
TP1.3
Test Case ID:
sCtl5
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

For the device which supports test/blocked and blocked and only internal control objects without physical outputs, the sCtl5 step 6 and step 10 does not apply.

Suggest to update the expected result for step 6 and step 10 to:

Commands are accepted.
For control objects with wired physical outputs, the outputs are blocked, DUT sends CommandTermination with AddCause = blocked-by-mode.
For control objects without wired physical outputs, command is executed.

Files

sCtl5.docx sCtl5.docx 23.3 KB Thierry Dufaure, 04/03/2023 08:26 AM
sCtl5_210423.docx sCtl5_210423.docx 23.4 KB Thierry Dufaure, 04/21/2023 04:47 AM
#1

Updated by Hua Qin almost 2 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Hua Qin wrote:

For the device which supports test/blocked and blocked and only internal control objects without physical outputs, the sCtl5 step 6 and step 10 does not apply.

Suggest to update the expected result for step 6 and step 10 to:

Commands are accepted.
For control objects with wired physical outputs, the outputs are blocked, DUT sends CommandTermination with AddCause = blocked-by-mode.
For control objects without wired physical outputs, DUT sends CommandTermination+

#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG almost 2 years ago

  • Due date set to 03/21/2023
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Perhaps the description of the concept should be to test blocking only for controls with physical output? To be considered further...

#3

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG almost 2 years ago

  • Due date changed from 03/21/2023 to 04/04/2023
  • Assignee changed from Richard Schimmel to Thierry Dufaure
#4

Updated by Thierry Dufaure over 1 year ago

  • File sCtl5.docx sCtl5.docx added
  • Due date changed from 04/04/2023 to 04/19/2023
  • Assignee changed from Thierry Dufaure to IEC 61850 TPWG

See the modified sCtl5 test procedures. The note 4) explains the condition for selecting the correct LN resp. controllable DataObject that is suitable for the Beh blocked, test/blocked test cases.

#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG over 1 year ago

  • Due date changed from 04/19/2023 to 05/02/2023
  • Assignee changed from IEC 61850 TPWG to Thierry Dufaure

Text clarification to be added.

#6

Updated by Ursula Kramarczyk over 1 year ago

  • Assignee changed from Thierry Dufaure to Ursula Kramarczyk
#7

Updated by Ursula Kramarczyk over 1 year ago

the cCtl5.docx proposes the last sentence of test case comments:

The test steps 6,7 and 9,10 can not be performed with internal controllable objects.

Word internal is not self-evident in context of controllable objects. To match wording the 61850-7-4 uses in table A.1: Values of mode and behaviour - proposal the last sentence:
The test steps 6,7 and 9,10 can not be performed with internal (no wired output) controllable objects.

#8

Updated by Thierry Dufaure over 1 year ago

see updated draft that includes the comment resolution:
1) to execute the command at the electrical interface to the process – i.e. an DataObject with Wired Output to the process
and
The test steps 6,7 and 9,10 can not be performed with internal (no wired output) controllable objects.

#9

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG over 1 year ago

Agreed.

Wired Output -> wired output

#10

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
#11

Updated by Richard Schimmel 10 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Updated Test Document set to TP1.3

Also available in: Atom PDF