Feature #5078
Clarification on the ctlModel 1/3
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
09/20/2021
Due date:
01/20/2022 (over 2 years late)
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
2
Source:
MH
TF Unique ID:
2 # MH
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):
IEC 61850-7-1 / 7-2 Ed2.1 / 7-5/7-500
Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
Description
What is the purpose of 'ctlModel' at X group level, Y group level respectively? Operator switchgear controls are managed by CSWI LN, so a Select to allow the operator to think twice before Operate is not needed on X group level.
Proposal descriptions
WG 10 needs to decide which task force needs to take a look at all the parts and determine the best approach as to where the clarification(s) needs to be made.
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Triage
Should XCBR (for instance) ctlModel equals to CSWI ctlModel?
ATCC - YLTC? The same?
Action item: Send the question to 7-500 to get more information.
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 3 years ago
- Related to Feature #5079: Clarification on the ctlModel 2/3 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 3 years ago
- Related to Feature #5080: Clarification on the ctlModel 3/3 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 3 years ago
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
- To discuss in WG10 changed from No to Yes
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from Triage to Resolved
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
- Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-7-1 / 7-2 Ed2.1 to IEC 61850-7-1 / 7-2 Ed2.1 / 7-5/7-500
The three ctlModel issues will be addressed by 7-5/7-500 Task Force.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 1 year ago
- Copied to IEC61850-7-5 #6382: Clarification on the ctlModel 1/3 added