Feature #5079
Clarification on the ctlModel 2/3
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
09/20/2021
Due date:
01/20/2022 (about 23 months late)
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
3
Source:
MH
TF Unique ID:
3 # MH
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):
IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1, 7-500
Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
Description
Add a statement about the relation between the 'ctlModel' of the controller LN and the 'ctlModel' of the proxy LN, e.g. CSWI.Pos--XCBR.Pos or ATCC.TapPos--YLTC.TapPos .The ctlModels can be different/must be the same?
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Triage
Refer to 7-500. First issue was about "do we need ctlModel". Second issue is about "once we need it, should it be equal between Cxxx and Xxxx?
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5078: Clarification on the ctlModel 1/3 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from Triage to Resolved
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Updated by Tom Berry almost 2 years ago
- Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1 to IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1, 7-500
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 7 months ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 6 months ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Updated by Vladan Cvejic 6 months ago
- Copied to IEC61850-7-5 #6380: Clarification on the ctlModel 2/3 added