Feature #5080
Clarification on the ctlModel 3/3
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
09/20/2021
Due date:
01/20/2022 (over 2 years late)
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
ID:
4
Source:
MH
TF Unique ID:
4 # MH
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):
IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1 ,7-500
Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
Description
Add a statement about the use of the 'ctlModel' that it is applicable for XCBR.Pos when subscribing to CSWI.Sel* and CSWI.Op*, but is bypassed when subscribing to PTRC.Tr . Note that both the Operate and the trip are of CDC ACT.
Proposal descriptions
Statement is needed in the standard (7-1 or 7-2 maybe) to be able to hace ctlModel in XCBR but bypassing it by PTRC.Tr. We need a statement that direct suscription bypasses control model.
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
- To discuss in WG10 changed from No to Yes
Statement is needed in the standard (7-1 or 7-2 maybe) to be able to hace ctlModel in XCBR but bypassing it by PTRC.Tr. We need a statement that direct suscription bypasses control model.
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 3 years ago
- Related to Feature #5078: Clarification on the ctlModel 1/3 added
Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
Updated by Tom Berry almost 3 years ago
- Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1 to IEC 61850-7-1 Ed2.1 ,7-500
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 1 year ago
- Copied to IEC61850-7-5 #6379: Clarification on the ctlModel 3/3 added