Issues #6697
sRpN9 does not specify the expected access error by negative response on SetURCBValues
Due date:
04/02/2024
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
Yes
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
7-2, 8-1
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sRpN9
Closed Reason:
Test Procedure Update
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:
Description
Basing on IEC 61850-7-2 Annex E (new in amd1) the current expected result of SetURCBValues without reservation (step 4 and 5) is:
DUT sends SetURCBValues response-
Basing on IEC 61850-8-1 SetURCBValues mapping to MMS Write it is the case "an object for which the MMS Client does not have access privileges". Thus, the expected result:
DUT sends SetURCBValues response- with data access error “object-access-denied”
Files
Updated by Thierry Dufaure 10 months ago
"temporarily unavailable" or "object access denied" is typically the options that we are allowing in such case.
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 10 months ago
- Due date set to 04/02/2024
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee set to Richard Schimmel
Accepted. "temporarily unavailable" or "object access denied"
Updated by Richard Schimmel 10 months ago
- File Solution to redmine 6697 sRpN9 errorcode.docx Solution to redmine 6697 sRpN9 errorcode.docx added
Solution attached
Updated by Richard Schimmel 7 months ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Closed Reason Test Procedure Update added
- Closed Reason deleted (
--Not Set---)