Issues #6697
sRpN9 does not specify the expected access error by negative response on SetURCBValues
Due date:
04/02/2024 (25 days late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
Yes
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
7-2, 8-1
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sRpN9
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:
Description
Basing on IEC 61850-7-2 Annex E (new in amd1) the current expected result of SetURCBValues without reservation (step 4 and 5) is:
DUT sends SetURCBValues response-
Basing on IEC 61850-8-1 SetURCBValues mapping to MMS Write it is the case "an object for which the MMS Client does not have access privileges". Thus, the expected result:
DUT sends SetURCBValues response- with data access error “object-access-denied”
Files
Updated by Thierry Dufaure 2 months ago
"temporarily unavailable" or "object access denied" is typically the options that we are allowing in such case.
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 2 months ago
- Due date set to 04/02/2024
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee set to Richard Schimmel
Accepted. "temporarily unavailable" or "object access denied"
Updated by Richard Schimmel 2 months ago
- File Solution to redmine 6697 sRpN9 errorcode.docx Solution to redmine 6697 sRpN9 errorcode.docx added
Solution attached