Issues #6280

sSBOes8 check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue

Added by Hua Qin 9 months ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Due date:
05/30/2023 (about 6 months late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:


Test case sSBOes8 is checking the consistency of Operate request and SelectWithValue.
Is it necessary to add a test case coping this test case and change Operate to Cancel?



Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 9 months ago

  • Due date set to 03/21/2023
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 8 months ago

  • Due date changed from 03/21/2023 to 05/02/2023

Updated by Richard Schimmel 7 months ago

  • Initial Test Document set to Amd1 TP1.2
  • Test Case ID set to sSBOes8
  • 61850 Standard 7-2 added

Agree - sSBOes8 abstract test case states "verify Operate or Cancel" but the detailed test procedure only verifies 'Operate' not the Cancel.
Propose to extend sSBOes8 with Cancel part in a similar way as sSBOns8


Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 7 months ago

  • Due date changed from 05/02/2023 to 05/30/2023

Remove 6.f and 6.g because device can do a plausibility check.

Richard to update


Updated by Richard Schimmel 7 months ago

removed Cancel.Test and Cancel.Check from the test procedure. Updated solution


Updated by Hua Qin 7 months ago

step 6, the expected result shall be Cancel response- because this is the Enhanced control model.


Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 5 months ago

solution to be updated to response- for these inconsistencies according to 7-2 table 108.


Updated by Richard Schimmel 5 months ago

Changed the expected result to Cancel resp- with AddCause 'inconsistent-parameters' according to part 7-2 table 108 and part 8-1 table 102.


Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 5 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

Also available in: Atom PDF