Issues #6280
sSBOes8 check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue
Description
Test case sSBOes8 is checking the consistency of Operate request and SelectWithValue.
Is it necessary to add a test case coping this test case and change Operate to Cancel?
Files
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 year ago
- Due date set to 03/21/2023
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee set to Richard Schimmel
Updated by Richard Schimmel 12 months ago
- Initial Test Document set to Amd1 TP1.2
- Test Case ID set to sSBOes8
- 61850 Standard 7-2 added
Agree - sSBOes8 abstract test case states "verify Operate or Cancel" but the detailed test procedure only verifies 'Operate' not the Cancel.
Propose to extend sSBOes8 with Cancel part in a similar way as sSBOns8
Updated by Richard Schimmel 12 months ago
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 11 months ago
- Due date changed from 05/02/2023 to 05/30/2023
Remove 6.f and 6.g because device can do a plausibility check.
Richard to update
Updated by Richard Schimmel 11 months ago
- File Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (16May2023).docx Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (16May2023).docx added
removed Cancel.Test and Cancel.Check from the test procedure. Updated solution
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 9 months ago
solution to be updated to response- for these inconsistencies according to 7-2 table 108.
Updated by Richard Schimmel 9 months ago
- File Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (19July2023).docx Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (19July2023).docx added
- Subject changed from Is it neccessary to add test case to check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue to sSBOes8 check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue
Changed the expected result to Cancel resp- with AddCause 'inconsistent-parameters' according to part 7-2 table 108 and part 8-1 table 102.
Updated by Richard Schimmel about 2 months ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Updated Test Document set to TP1.3