Issues #6280

Is it neccessary to add test case to check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue

Added by Hua Qin 3 months ago. Updated 11 days ago.

In Progress
Due date:
05/30/2023 (Due in 2 days)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:


Test case sSBOes8 is checking the consistency of Operate request and SelectWithValue.
Is it necessary to add a test case coping this test case and change Operate to Cancel?



Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 3 months ago

  • Due date set to 03/21/2023
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 month ago

  • Due date changed from 03/21/2023 to 05/02/2023

Updated by Richard Schimmel 26 days ago

  • Initial Test Document set to Amd1 TP1.2
  • Test Case ID set to sSBOes8
  • 61850 Standard 7-2 added

Agree - sSBOes8 abstract test case states "verify Operate or Cancel" but the detailed test procedure only verifies 'Operate' not the Cancel.
Propose to extend sSBOes8 with Cancel part in a similar way as sSBOns8


Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 12 days ago

  • Due date changed from 05/02/2023 to 05/30/2023

Remove 6.f and 6.g because device can do a plausibility check.

Richard to update


Updated by Richard Schimmel 12 days ago

removed Cancel.Test and Cancel.Check from the test procedure. Updated solution


Updated by Hua Qin 11 days ago

step 6, the expected result shall be Cancel response- because this is the Enhanced control model.

Also available in: Atom PDF