Project

General

Profile

Issues #6280

sSBOes8 check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue

Added by Hua Qin about 2 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Richard Schimmel
Due date:
05/30/2023
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
7-2
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Amd1 TP1.2
Updated Test Document:
TP1.3
Test Case ID:
sSBOes8
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

Test case sSBOes8 is checking the consistency of Operate request and SelectWithValue.
Is it necessary to add a test case coping this test case and change Operate to Cancel?

Files

Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8.docx Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8.docx 27.8 KB Richard Schimmel, 05/02/2023 06:30 AM
Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (16May2023).docx Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (16May2023).docx 28.2 KB Richard Schimmel, 05/16/2023 09:16 AM
Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (19July2023).docx Solution to redmine 6280 sSBOes8 (19July2023).docx 57.4 KB Richard Schimmel, 07/19/2023 03:40 AM
#1

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 2 years ago

  • Due date set to 03/21/2023
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel
#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 2 years ago

  • Due date changed from 03/21/2023 to 05/02/2023
#3

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 2 years ago

  • Initial Test Document set to Amd1 TP1.2
  • Test Case ID set to sSBOes8
  • 61850 Standard 7-2 added

Agree - sSBOes8 abstract test case states "verify Operate or Cancel" but the detailed test procedure only verifies 'Operate' not the Cancel.
Propose to extend sSBOes8 with Cancel part in a similar way as sSBOns8

#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG almost 2 years ago

  • Due date changed from 05/02/2023 to 05/30/2023

Remove 6.f and 6.g because device can do a plausibility check.

Richard to update

#6

Updated by Richard Schimmel almost 2 years ago

removed Cancel.Test and Cancel.Check from the test procedure. Updated solution

#7

Updated by Hua Qin almost 2 years ago

step 6, the expected result shall be Cancel response- because this is the Enhanced control model.

#8

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG almost 2 years ago

solution to be updated to response- for these inconsistencies according to 7-2 table 108.

#9

Updated by Richard Schimmel almost 2 years ago

Changed the expected result to Cancel resp- with AddCause 'inconsistent-parameters' according to part 7-2 table 108 and part 8-1 table 102.

#10

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
#11

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Updated Test Document set to TP1.3

Also available in: Atom PDF