Project

General

Profile

Issues #6280

Is it neccessary to add test case to check Cancel consistency with SelectWithValue

Added by Hua Qin 3 months ago. Updated 11 days ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Due date:
05/30/2023 (Due in 2 days)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
7-2
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sSBOes8
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

Test case sSBOes8 is checking the consistency of Operate request and SelectWithValue.
Is it necessary to add a test case coping this test case and change Operate to Cancel?


Files

#1

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 3 months ago

  • Due date set to 03/21/2023
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel
#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 month ago

  • Due date changed from 03/21/2023 to 05/02/2023
#3

Updated by Richard Schimmel 26 days ago

  • Initial Test Document set to Amd1 TP1.2
  • Test Case ID set to sSBOes8
  • 61850 Standard 7-2 added

Agree - sSBOes8 abstract test case states "verify Operate or Cancel" but the detailed test procedure only verifies 'Operate' not the Cancel.
Propose to extend sSBOes8 with Cancel part in a similar way as sSBOns8

#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 12 days ago

  • Due date changed from 05/02/2023 to 05/30/2023

Remove 6.f and 6.g because device can do a plausibility check.

Richard to update

#6

Updated by Richard Schimmel 12 days ago

removed Cancel.Test and Cancel.Check from the test procedure. Updated solution

#7

Updated by Hua Qin 11 days ago

step 6, the expected result shall be Cancel response- because this is the Enhanced control model.

Also available in: Atom PDF