CIM Issues #5334
TapChanger model update - 301
301 Ed8
Description
To accommodate the TapChanger/TapChangerControl model for distribution circuit regulator.
It is therefore needed that ‘secondary units’ to add to description for RegulatingControl.targetValue and some other UML updates consist of:
• One new attribute: TapChangerControl.minLimitVoltage
• One renamed attribute: TapChangerControl.limitVoltage to TapChangeControl.maxLimitVoltage
Besides, lots of description tweaks needed in the attached document.
Files
Proposed Solution
One new attribute: TapChangerControl.minLimitVoltage
One renamed attribute: TapChangerControl.limitVoltage to TapChangeControl.maxLimitVoltage
And a few classes/attributes descriptions clean-up and tweaks. Details can be found in the attached document.
Decision
[03/30/2022] WG13 agrees with the changes proposed.
Oslo, 13 June 2023
The following changes are on hold and need to be considered in the control clean up:
TapChanger.initialDelay to RegulatingControl.initialDelay
TapChanger.subsequentDelay to TapChangerControl.subsequentDelay
Remove ShuntCompensator.aVRDelay in favor of RegulatingControl.initialDelay
Note that for ctRatio and ptRatio were added to TapChanger, but these attributes are also in TapChangerInfo. Should we delete them from TapChangerInfo?
=> The decision is that we keep it like it is so the attributes will exist on 2 places. The usege is different.
Question: Should ptRatio and ctRatio be added to 452 EQ?
=>The decision is Yes. To be decided in which profile - probably in the unbalance profile as it was needed for the distribution
Another question: TapChangerControl.maxLimitVoltage and minLimitVoltage are not in 452, Should we add them?
=> We need to add them to 456 - SSH unbalanced
Also look at issue 3808 related to master-follower.
18-Sep-2024 Joint TF Hybrid Meetings (revisited topic):
=> UML to be updated to add two new attributes: ControlFunctionBlock.normalMaxAllowedTargetValue and .normalMinAllowedTargetValue
=> These new attributes must be added to the 452
=> For the unbalanced profile we need to consider maxLimitVoltage and minLimitVoltage in 456 SSH
Release Notes
The following changes are applied to 301
- added TapChanger.ctRatio
- added TapChanger.ptRatio
- typos in RegulatngControl description
- update descriptions of RegulatingControl: .descrete, .maxAllowedTargetValue, .minAllowedTragetValue, .targetValue, .targetDeadband, .targetValueUnitMultiplier
- update of TapChangerControl description
- TapChangerControl.limitVoltage renamed to maxLimitVoltage and description updated
- TapChangerControl.minLimitVoltage added
Updated by Yang Feng about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from TapChanger model update to TapChanger model update - 301
- Author/Contact Info set to chuck.dubose@pcitek.com
- Solution to be Applied To set to CIM18v02
- Proposed Solution updated (diff)
- Breaking Change changed from No to Yes
- Breaking Change Description set to One renamed attribute: TapChangerControl.limitVoltage to TapChangeControl.maxLimitVoltage
- Standard(s) set to 301 Ed8
- Origination Date set to 03/30/2022
- Decision updated (diff)
Updated by Yang Feng about 3 years ago
Updated by Chavdar Ivanov over 2 years ago
- Release Notes updated (diff)
From the document it is not clear if the following changes are decided:
TapChanger.initialDelay to RegulatingControl.initialDelay
TapChanger.subsequentDelay to TapChangerControl.subsequentDelay
Remove ShuntCompensator.aVRDelay in favor of RegulatingControl.initialDelay
Note that for ctRatio and cpRatio were added to TapChanger, but these attributes are also in TapChangerInfo. Shoudl we delete them from TapChangerInfo?
Question: Should ptRatio and ctRation be added to 452 EQ?
Another question: TapChangeerControl.maxLimitVoltage and minLimitVoltage are not in 452, Should we add them?
Thease are the only additional changes to be agreed before closing the issue
See also issue "TapChanger and TapChangerInfo .ctRating, .ctRatio and .ptRatio attributes"
Updated by Chavdar Ivanov over 2 years ago
- Solution Version set to CIM18v03
- Solution Applied By set to Chavdar Ivanov
- Completion Date set to 02/11/2023
- Release Notes updated (diff)
Updated by Chavdar Ivanov almost 2 years ago
- Decision updated (diff)
From the document it is not clear if the following changes are decided:
TapChanger.initialDelay to RegulatingControl.initialDelay
TapChanger.subsequentDelay to TapChangerControl.subsequentDelay
Remove ShuntCompensator.aVRDelay in favor of RegulatingControl.initialDelay
Note that for ctRatio and cpRatio were added to TapChanger, but these attributes are also in TapChangerInfo. Shoudl we delete them from TapChangerInfo?
Question: Should ptRatio and ctRation be added to 452 EQ?
Another question: TapChangeerControl.maxLimitVoltage and minLimitVoltage are not in 452, Should we add them?
Thease are the only additional changes to be agreed before closing the issue
See also issue "TapChanger and TapChangerInfo .ctRating, .ctRatio and .ptRatio attributes"