Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #6872

Make TP easier to compare

Added by Todd Viegut 3 months ago. Updated 2 months ago.

Status:
Open
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Todd Viegut
Base Release:
CIM18
Solution to be Applied To:
CIM18
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
Yes
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):

IEC 61970-456, IEC 61970-450

Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

There is a need to compare the output results of different studies over time. Today we are using the BusNameMarker which is a “human readable” approach, but which is not technically persistent. We need a machine-readable approach.

The primary goal is to be able to link a series of PF solutions to the relevant terminals. So, the reason for putting SV voltage on a TopologicalNode is that all the terminals linked to that TopologicalNode will have the same values. Currently we require that all injection flows are included in the solution but not all the terminals that are energized are included. This leads to some tooling having to post-process the solution so that it can show the flow on both sides of a line for instance.

Requirements:
  • Both mRID and name of the TopologicalNode needs to be persistent across executions.
  • The user should be able to identify which TopologicalNode-s are persistent and which have been generated as a result of abnormal switching.
Relevant Use Cases that need to be supported:
  • From a State Estimation case we want to be able to see changes over time of a particular value in a series of SV-s
  • From Power Flow cases we want to compare the changes over time as well as comparing other Power Flow solutions for the same time (e.g. D-2 for hour 3 compared to D-1 for the same hour 3)
  • We want to also be able to compare what we’ve calculate in a Power Flow case against what is happening in real time operations (e.g. compare with a calculated D-1 for hour 3 with what happened at D for hour 3)

Proposed Solution

14-Aug-2024: Discussed solutions in our weekly TF13 call.

Potential Solutions:

  • One possible solution is to move the SvVoltage to SvPowerFlow (i.e. moving SvVoltage away from TopologicalNode and merging it into SvPowerFlow).
  • Add a isRetained to TopologicalNode (or BusNameMarker)
  • Merge TP and BusNameMarker to make TP persistent - or as a minimum make the connection between Voltage on TP to Terminal (Svein suggested)

Decision

19-Sep-2024 Joint TF Hybrid Meetings - Minneapolis:

Reviewed. We discussed a couple of approaches but are not proposing a final option yet.

Action Item:
Svein will work on a proposal to be reviewed in an upcoming Wednesday call.


Related issues

Blocked by WG13 Issues - CIM Issues #6871: Review the existing TP and SV profiles to determine a more logical split In ProgressActions
Blocks WG13 Issues - CIM Issues #6873: Create support for fault and unsolved solutionOpenActions

Also available in: Atom PDF