Project

General

Profile

Improvement #672

Create DO indicating the source of synchronisation

Added by Maud Merley over 3 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
05/17/2021
Due date:
10/17/2021 (over 3 years late)
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
46
Source:
RTE
TF Unique ID:
46 # RTE
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):

TR IEC 61850-7-500

Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
61850-7-500 Ed2

Description

Proposal to add in LTMS a DO indicating the current source of synchronisation of the IED. This should be done in a consistent way with SynSrcId added in the SV ADSU in 9-2 ed2.1.
Proposal: add new DO (> 64 bit ) to LTMS and MMXU.


Proposal descriptions

- For LTMS, 7-4 Ed2.1 already addresses the issue.
- For MMXU, it does not seem to be the best place to have the proposed new DO. Maybe the proxy TCTR or TVTR in the subscriber is the good place to have the DO indicating the time source of the sampled value stream the instance is connected to. Also LSVS could be a better place to have this information. To be discussed in WG10.
- Issue should be addressed by TF 7-500


Related issues

Copied to 61850-7-5 and 61850-7-500 - IEC61850-7-5 #6607: Create DO indicating the source of synchronisationNew05/17/202110/17/2021

Actions
#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 3 years ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Due date set to 10/17/2021
  • Category set to Standard extension required
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
  • To discuss in WG10 changed from No to Yes
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-7-4

2021-09-28
- RTE has an use case where they want to know if all the sources are synchronized with the same clock
- 9.2 Ed2.1 has a bit to say global or local clock source, but there could be several local clocks, for example
- We could have one clock for samples synchronization and other for other functionalities
Agreed:
- For LTMS, 7-4 Ed2.1 already addresses the issue.
- For MMXU, it does not seem to be the best place to have the proposed new DO. Maybe the proxy TCTR or TVTR in the subscriber is the good place to have the DO indicating the time source of the sampled value stream the instance is connected to. Also LSVS could be a better place to have this information. To be discussed in WG10.
- A tissue on 7-4 could be created to eliminate the 'date' reference to IEC 61850-9-3 in the normative references section. Also to reference 9-3 instead of 61588 in LTMS 'TmSrc' DO definition. TO BE DISCUSSED WITH HENRY.

#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

2021-09-28:
- A discussion about the use of this new DO is ongoing. Should be or not be used for protection purposes..

#4

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • ID set to 46
  • TF Unique ID set to 46 # RTE

TF Unique ID set

#5

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 3 years ago

- Keep the issue open and RTE will provide more detail use case
- Take into account proposals from communication supervision task force regarding extension of LSVS

#6

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 3 years ago

  • To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
#7

Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Triage
#8

Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Triage to Resolved
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
  • Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-7-4 to IEC 61850-90-4
#9

Updated by Bruce Muschlitz over 2 years ago

By definition, the time source of MMXU computations is the IED itself, thus LTMS.TmSrc

#10

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Needs More Information set to No
#11

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#12

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

We need more information from RTE about what exaclty the issue is.

#13

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
#14

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#15

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 1 year ago

  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
  • Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-90-4 to TR IEC 61850-7-500
  • Assigned TF 61850-7-500 Ed2 added

Rerouted to 7-500 TF (copy).

#16

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 1 year ago

#17

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No

Also available in: Atom PDF