Project

General

Profile

Issues #6724

GOOSE Subscriber sGos12 test expects DUT to _send_ a GOOSE message

Added by Ursula Kramarczyk 10 months ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Due date:
08/06/2024 (about 5 months late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
Yes
Clause Reference:
18.2.3.6
61850 Standard:
7-2
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sGos12
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

The expected result of mandatory sGos12 demands that DUT sends (so, it publishes) a GOOSE message. What if DUT does not have Publisher services, or its GoCB do not refer dataset with the subscribed state change?


Files

#1

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 9 months ago

  • Project changed from Server to Client
  • Due date set to 04/16/2024
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Add a client tp to test GOOSE subscriber without server model.

Changed to client test.

Richard to submit proposal. PIXIT should indicate how the data received is exposed.

#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 8 months ago

  • Due date changed from 04/16/2024 to 04/30/2024
#3

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 8 months ago

  • Due date changed from 04/30/2024 to 05/28/2024
#4

Updated by Richard Schimmel 7 months ago

Added solution - need to be reviewed at TPWG

#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 7 months ago

  • Due date changed from 05/28/2024 to 06/11/2024

Change "display" to "expose as described in PIXIT"

#6

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 7 months ago

  • Due date changed from 06/11/2024 to 07/09/2024
#7

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 5 months ago

  • Due date changed from 07/09/2024 to 08/06/2024
#8

Updated by Richard Schimmel 5 months ago

Updated the solution;
How about sGos6b, putting the device in simulation mode “LPHD.Sim=T”. Should we keep this?

#9

Updated by Richard Schimmel 5 months ago

Solution updated sGos6 updates

Also available in: Atom PDF