Issues #6633
sRp15, sBr15 test description contains doName="MMXU...", while MMXU is lnClass, not doName
Description
The test case sRp15 and sBr15 description gives in point 1 the SCL examples of following FCDA elements of a dataset:
- doName=”MMXU.PhV”
- doName=”MMXU.A” daName=”phsA”
- doName=”MMXU.A” daName=”phsB.cVal”
- doName=”MMXU.A” daName=”phsC.cVal.mag”
- doName=”MMXU.A” daName=”neut.cVal.mag.f“
But in SCL, in the the dataset elements, a Logical Node (and MMXU is a Logical Node) are defined by lnClass and lnInst, not in doName, e.g.:
<DataSet name="dataMX">
<FCDA ldInst="ON" lnClass="MMXU" lnInst="1" doName="PhV" fc="MX" />
<FCDA ldInst="ON" lnClass="MMXU" lnInst="1" doName="A" fc="MX" />
</DataSet>
And, complex Data Objects like PhV and A (class WYE) have sub-elements (e.g. phsA) which are Data Object, not Attributes - of class CMV. The FC is defined by DA elements of CMV, not by elements of WYE. Is then daName=”phsA” wrong as "phsA" belongs into doName?
Files
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 year ago
- Due date set to 01/09/2024
- Assignee set to Richard Schimmel
Editorial change accepted.
Updated by Richard Schimmel about 1 year ago
Attached solution.
Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 12 months ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
LN instance and lDevice are missing. This is example text, and those are required and will be caught in schema test-> accepted for clarity.
Updated by Richard Schimmel 10 months ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Updated Test Document set to TP1.3