Improvement #629
TCTR and TVTR new DO to identify physical terminal allocation in the IED
Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago.
Updated 10 months ago.
Category:
Standard extension required
Due date:
08/16/2021 (over 3 years late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Short Proposal:
Describe analog I/O similar to LDPI/LDPO for digital I/O.
Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
61850-90-29 - Physical resource management
Description
Need to have a new DO to identify the physical terminal allocation of a TVTR and TCTR.
We want to have a DO that allows to identify that a LN TVTR and a LN TCTR. This new DO will describe the physical VT / CT interface, as done in LPDI / LPDO for digital I/O.
Helpful for maintenance and exploitation of the system.
Proposal descriptions
Routed to task force 90-29 "Physical I/O description". Will be discussed after circulation of the TR 90-29.
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Short Proposal set to Describe analog I/O similar to LDPI/LDPO for digital I/O. Check with task force "Physical I/O description"
- Standard(s) deleted (
IEC 61850-7-4)
Meeting 2020-12-17:
The idea is to describe in the model the analog I/O similar to the LDPI/LPDO for digital I/O. To check with the task force in charge of the physical I/O description data model. It seems the analog I/O modelled in this task force is only related to mA inputs for temperature and this kind of things.
A dedicated logical node or a new DO inside TVTR and TCTR.
UF to check with the task force in charge of physiscal I/O description.
- Due date set to 08/16/2021
- Status changed from In Progress to Triage
- Short Proposal changed from Describe analog I/O similar to LDPI/LDPO for digital I/O. Check with task force "Physical I/O description" to Describe analog I/O similar to LDPI/LDPO for digital I/O.
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
- To discuss in WG10 set to No
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
2021-03-02: RTE to provide a more detailed use case.
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
2021-03-02: DPL.location could be used for identifying the bay level, but not for physical connection
Clarification needed: "is it enough to put inside substation section instead of a DO (through data model)?"
TF group does not think that every SCL feature should be mapped into a DO, online model.
Precision about the use case : to be able to indicate the link between the IED and the physical terminal of Instrument Transformer or bay terminal block. The use of boundary LN, in a similar approach than digital inputs / outputs with LPDI / LPDO, could be a solution. This issue was sent to Physical Ressources TF (Dehui Chen) on 2021-03-10, proposal to discuss these new issues after circulation of the TR 90-29.
- Subject changed from TCTR and TVTR new DO to identify common bay level to TCTR and TVTR new DO to identify physical terminal allocation in the IED
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Triage to Resolved
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
- Standard(s) set to IEC TR 61850-90-29
- Needs More Information set to No
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
The physical terminal allocation of a TVTR and TCTR is considered in 90-29. The model can be seen in the CD with is in circulation.
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- Assigned TF 61850-90-29 - Physical resource management added
Also available in: Atom
PDF