Improvement #6248
There are controls between IEDs for automatic control functions, we need to be able to represent those controls in SCL (for configuration in SCT, data flow documentation...)
0%
IEC 61850-6
Description
Use cases detailled in the attached presentation
There are controls between IEDs for automatic control functions, for example:- 90-6 : The IED Controller performing the AATS (Automatic transfer between two source) needs to control XCBRs in other IEDs
- 7-4 : The IED Controller performing ARCO (Reactive power control) needs to control XSWIs in another IED
- 7-4 : The IED Controller performing ATCC (Automatic tap changer controller) needs to control YLTC in another IED
- Specify controls that an IED (performing automatic control functions) needs to perform for its logic
- Configure such controls of an IED, with a top/down approach, in the SCT, during the configuration process. Usefull also during the maintenance of the substation
- Document the data flows between IEDs, including the controls
- Document the binding of the controls to the internal addresses of the IED
Files
Proposal descriptions
In SCL, add elements equivalent to Inputs/Extref for Controls
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- WG10 Proposal set to Create a task force to propose a solution to the issue
- Estimated Completion set to Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2 or edition 3, depending on Task Force result
- To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
- Short Proposal set to Te
WG10 agreement:
- The issue is accepted: a solution is needed
- A Task Force will be created to start thinking on a possible solution
- Depending on the result of the task force:
+ The solution could be addressed in amendment 2.2 if it is not too complex / long
+ The solution could be addressed in edition 3 of the standard
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
Task force has been created. Ongoing work. Not still sure if will be addressed in 2.2 or edition 3.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
Updated by Aurelie Dehouck over 1 year ago
We will discuss this point and present a first draft of SCL evolutions during next WG10 meeting (during TF 7-5 / 7-500)
The proposition is posted on IEC collaboration platForm, here : https://collaborate.iec.ch/#/pages/workspaces/137211/documents/189918/details/764417
Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 1 year ago
- WG10 Proposal deleted (
Create a task force to propose a solution to the issue) - Estimated Completion changed from Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2 or edition 3, depending on Task Force result to Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2
- Assigned TF None added
According to a WG10 meeting in Regensburg (14.06.2023) - this issue will be resolved in Amd2 of Part 6.
Link to presentation: https://collaborate.iec.ch/#/pages/workspaces/137211/documents/189918/details/764417?onlyWithPreview=false&fileId=764417