Project

General

Profile

Improvement #6248

There are controls between IEDs for automatic control functions, we need to be able to represent those controls in SCL (for configuration in SCT, data flow documentation...)

Added by Aurelie Dehouck over 2 years ago. Updated almost 2 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Start date:
02/03/2023
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
Source:
EDF
TF Unique ID:
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
None

Description

Use cases detailled in the attached presentation

There are controls between IEDs for automatic control functions, for example:
  • 90-6 : The IED Controller performing the AATS (Automatic transfer between two source) needs to control XCBRs in other IEDs
  • 7-4 : The IED Controller performing ARCO (Reactive power control) needs to control XSWIs in another IED
  • 7-4 : The IED Controller performing ATCC (Automatic tap changer controller) needs to control YLTC in another IED
We need to be able to represent controls in SCL, to be able to:
  • Specify controls that an IED (performing automatic control functions) needs to perform for its logic
  • Configure such controls of an IED, with a top/down approach, in the SCT, during the configuration process. Usefull also during the maintenance of the substation
  • Document the data flows between IEDs, including the controls
  • Document the binding of the controls to the internal addresses of the IED

Files

SCL configuration of MMS controls.pptx SCL configuration of MMS controls.pptx 2.4 MB Aurelie Dehouck, 02/03/2023 04:07 AM

Proposal descriptions

In SCL, add elements equivalent to Inputs/Extref for Controls

#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • WG10 Proposal set to Create a task force to propose a solution to the issue
  • Estimated Completion set to Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2 or edition 3, depending on Task Force result
  • To discuss in WG10 changed from Yes to No
  • Short Proposal set to Te

WG10 agreement:
- The issue is accepted: a solution is needed
- A Task Force will be created to start thinking on a possible solution
- Depending on the result of the task force:
+ The solution could be addressed in amendment 2.2 if it is not too complex / long
+ The solution could be addressed in edition 3 of the standard

#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 2 years ago

  • Short Proposal deleted (Te)
#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 2 years ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#4

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 2 years ago

Task force has been created. Ongoing work. Not still sure if will be addressed in 2.2 or edition 3.

#5

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 2 years ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
#6

Updated by Aurelie Dehouck almost 2 years ago

We will discuss this point and present a first draft of SCL evolutions during next WG10 meeting (during TF 7-5 / 7-500)
The proposition is posted on IEC collaboration platForm, here : https://collaborate.iec.ch/#/pages/workspaces/137211/documents/189918/details/764417

#7

Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 2 years ago

  • WG10 Proposal deleted (Create a task force to propose a solution to the issue)
  • Estimated Completion changed from Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2 or edition 3, depending on Task Force result to Solution to be included in Amendment 2.2
  • Assigned TF None added

According to a WG10 meeting in Regensburg (14.06.2023) - this issue will be resolved in Amd2 of Part 6.
Link to presentation: https://collaborate.iec.ch/#/pages/workspaces/137211/documents/189918/details/764417?onlyWithPreview=false&fileId=764417

Also available in: Atom PDF