Issues #6193
sRpN5 does not test for the case where URCBs are association based (non-indexed).
Added by IEC 61850 TPWG almost 2 years ago.
Updated 9 months ago.
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Description
the goal of the test is that an URCB instance is “protected” and can’t be changed by another client. When URCBs are non-indexed (association based) such protection is evident, but there should be a test case to be sure that two clients get their own URCB instance.
This applies to both edition 2 and edition 2.1
Files
I agree with the proposal of Richard.
I recommend nevertheless the wording:
when (SCL ReportControl indexed=true or SCL ReportControl indexed is not present) and response+ when SCL indexed=false
- Due date changed from 01/10/2023 to 01/24/2023
- Assignee changed from Richard Schimmel to Thierry Dufaure
Thierry is to investigate further whether indexed="false" is allowed with only one instance.
indexed="false" is allowed with max="1".
Propose wording:
DUT sends SetURCBValues response+ when (SCL indexed=false and max > 1), otherwise DUT sends SetURCBValues response- with data access error = temporarily-unavailable.
- Assignee changed from Thierry Dufaure to Richard Schimmel
note: max is an attribute of RptEnabled
Updated according to last proposal.
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Updated Test Document set to TP1.3
Also available in: Atom
PDF