Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #5302

Explicit association between TransformerTank and TransformerTankInfo

Added by Pat Brown about 2 years ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Solution Version:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13, WG14
Requestor:
Pat Brown
Standard(s):

61968-11, 61968-4, 61970-301, 61968-13

Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

The existing AssetInfo.PowerSystemResource association allows associations between instances of child classes that are utterly illogical. This forces each profile using the AssetInfo.PowerSystemResource association to re-articulate constraints that are universal and would more logically be expressed in the canonical UML. This issue aims to start correcting the problem by suggesting one specific association.

Pat (2023-05-24): This could be condsidered as a part of issue 6147 - Streamlining of tank-based transformer modelling

Files

2022-01-19 Device Datasheet TransformerTank TransformerTankInfo requested UML updates.docx 2022-01-19 Device Datasheet TransformerTank TransformerTankInfo requested UML updates.docx 573 KB Pat Brown, 01/30/2022 05:07 AM
2022-01-30 Device Datasheet TransformerTank TransformerTankInfo requested UML updates.docx 2022-01-30 Device Datasheet TransformerTank TransformerTankInfo requested UML updates.docx 571 KB Pat Brown, 01/30/2022 05:34 AM

Decision

Need to coordinate between the 61968-4 for creating AssetInfoAssembly and current Transformer model to test procedure dataset.

This issue is related to GMDM issue #1 (Yang to add) (09/22/2022)

Also available in: Atom PDF