Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #7034

Resolve ambiguity / multiple interpretations (that conflict) in the constraints/rules/documents around ConnectivityNode containment for ACDCConverter scenario.

Added by Todd Viegut 4 days ago. Updated 4 days ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Todd Viegut; todd.viegut@gmail.com
Base Release:
CIM17
Solution to be Applied To:
CIM18
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
61970-Wires
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):

IEC 61970-301, IEC 61970-452, IEC 61970-600-2

Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

When fielding implementation-related questions for the 456 TP profile, Chavdar and I identified that we currently have ambiguity and two interpretations (that conflict) expressed across current publications of the 301/452/456.

Specifically, a question came up pertaining to ConnectivityNodes, ConnectivityNodeContainers and containment. The context being tracing out the BaseVoltage corresponding to a ConnectivityNode/container. The BaseVoltage being that corresponding to a particular TopologicalNode in a TP profile (where TopologicalNode -> BaseVoltage is required).

Attached to this JIRA is a PDF with background and highlights around the ambiguity. Discussion and decisions are needed as to how we may want to eliminate this ambiguity/conflict via new (or updated) constraints for our end-users.

Files

Redmine Issue #7034 Background.pdf View Redmine Issue #7034 Background.pdf 400 KB Todd Viegut, 10/24/2024 12:37 PM

Also available in: Atom PDF