CIM Issues #7034
Updated by Todd Viegut 4 days ago
When fielding implementation-related questions for the 456 TP profile, Chavdar and I identified that we currently have ambiguity and two interpretations (that conflict) expressed across current publications of the 301/452/456. Specifically, during some CGMES related-testing a question came come up pertaining to ConnectivityNodes, ConnectivityNodeContainers and containment. The context being tracing out the BaseVoltage corresponding ConnectivityNodeContainer(s) assigned to a ConnectivityNode/container. The the ConnectivityNode to be used for tracing/locating the appropriate BaseVoltage being that corresponding to (where the BaseVoltage is a particular required association for TopologicalNode in a the TP profile (where TopologicalNode -> BaseVoltage is required). profile). Attached to this JIRA is a PDF with background and highlights around the ambiguity. Discussion and decisions are needed as to how we may want to eliminate this ambiguity/conflict via new (or updated) constraints for our end-users.