CIM Issues #7034: Resolve ambiguity / multiple interpretations (that conflict) in the constraints/rules/documents around ConnectivityNode containment for ACDCConverter scenario. - WG13 Issues - UCAIug Issue Tracking System

CIM Issues #7034

Resolve ambiguity / multiple interpretations (that conflict) in the constraints/rules/documents around ConnectivityNode containment for ACDCConverter scenario.

Added by Todd Viegut 2 months ago. Updated 2 months ago.

Status:

New

Priority:

Normal

Author/Contact Info:

Todd Viegut; todd.viegut@gmail.com

Base Release:

CIM17

Solution to be Applied To:

CIM18

Solution Version:

Solution Applied By:

Completion Date:

CIM Keywords:

61970-Wires

Breaking Change:

Breaking Change Description:

CIM Impacted Groups:

WG13

Requestor:

Standard(s):

IEC 61970-301, IEC 61970-452, IEC 61970-600-2

Version:

Clause:

Sub-Clause:

Paragraph:

Table:

Originally Closed in Version:

Origination Date:

Origination ID:

Originally Assigned To:

Description

When fielding implementation-related questions for the 456 TP profile, Chavdar and I identified that we currently have ambiguity and two interpretations (that conflict) expressed across current publications of the 301/452/456.

Specifically, a question came up pertaining to ConnectivityNodes, ConnectivityNodeContainers and containment. The context being tracing out the BaseVoltage corresponding to a ConnectivityNode/container. The BaseVoltage being that corresponding to a particular TopologicalNode in a TP profile (where TopologicalNode -> BaseVoltage is required).

Attached to this JIRA is a PDF with background and highlights around the ambiguity. Discussion and decisions are needed as to how we may want to eliminate this ambiguity/conflict via new (or updated) constraints for our end-users.

Files

Redmine Issue #7034 Background.pdf

View Redmine Issue #7034 Background.pdf

400 KB

Todd Viegut, 10/24/2024 12:37 PM