Project

General

Profile

Issues #6988

sCtl16 in TP1.3 is in conflict with 7-4 Table B.1

Added by Richard Schimmel 6 months ago. Updated 6 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Due date:
12/10/2024 (about 3 months late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
Part 7-4 Table B.1
61850 Standard:
7-4
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
Closed Reason:
Test Procedure Update
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

Table B.1 is very clear that if XCBR/XSWI/Loc=T a command with orCat bay/station/remote is Not Allowed. But in sCtl16 and PIXIT Ct29 it is allowed. It seems we don't need PIXIT Ct29 because Table B.1 is very clear.

We need to rewrite sCtl16 to match Table B.1.
- the pre-condition for the first steps is XCBR/XSWI.Loc=F and CSWI.Loc is True.
- When XCBR/XSWI/Loc=T a command with orCat bay/station/remote is Not Allowed
- remove PIXIT entry CT29


Files


Related issues

Related to Server - Issues #5961: sCtl16 shall specify LocSta/MltLev to match with table B.1ClosedThierry Dufaure12/13/2022Actions
#1

Updated by Hua Qin 5 months ago

  • Related to Issues #5961: sCtl16 shall specify LocSta/MltLev to match with table B.1 added
#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 4 months ago

  • Due date set to 11/12/2024
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Accepted. Thierry and Richard to review and propose corrections.

#4

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 4 months ago

  • Due date changed from 11/12/2024 to 12/10/2024
#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 2 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Closed Reason Test Procedure Update added
  • Closed Reason deleted (--Not Set---)
#6

Updated by Richard Schimmel 6 days ago

In the attached file is an error:

The SBOes step 5, should be: Change LLN0/CSWI.Loc to True and keep XCBR/XSWI.Loc to False

Also available in: Atom PDF