Project

General

Profile

IEC61850-7-5 #6698

Integrate work from AHTF Control Between Functions

Added by Keith Gray 10 months ago. Updated 24 days ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Start date:
02/07/2024
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Source:
Category:
Not yet categorized
TF 7-5 Project document:
IEC 61850-7-5, IEC 61850-7-500
Related TISSUE:

Description

Collect the work created by this AHTF and integrate it into 7-5 and 7-500. We need to locate the latest draft of the document, review that draft, and determine how to integrate it with our documents.


Related issues

Related to 61850-7-5 and 61850-7-500 - IEC61850-7-5 #6787: Harmonization of Table 4 with Figure 22In ProgressMichael Haecker05/15/2024

Actions
#1

Updated by Tom Berry 10 months ago

One of the issues is that MMS control service status and results are not visible in IED device models.
For a distribution automation application I added data objects
CILO or
CSWI OpStr control in progress

SSWI OpTmAlm control failure (timeout)
SSWI OpErrCod control result (cause)

#2

Updated by Keith Gray 5 months ago

#3

Updated by Herbert Falk 26 days ago

Test Note

#4

Updated by Keith Gray 24 days ago

Two issues raised by Kota Kawasaki during the Nanjing meeting:
1. Value of XCBR.Pos.ctlModel:

  • What should the value of XCBR.POS.ctlModel be when controlling via GOOSE messages?
  • We would like to manage the model separately depending on whether the selection function (XCBR.POS.stSeld) and response monitoring (XCBR.POS.opOk) are enabled at the process level.
  • My understanding is that the ctlModel value in IEC 61850-7-2, 3 Ed2.1 does not focus on control via GOOSE messages, and the value of XCBR.POS.ctlModel is status-only even if it is controlled via GOOSE messages.
  • Thierry: This understanding is correct. Recommend not to use the term "Control via GOOSE".
  • Christoph B: How to indicate whether direct operate or SBO is used? * Thierry: * Option 1: Later binding ExtRefs with the appropriate descriptions and types * Option 2: Data flow binding is done by ICT configuration
  • Michael: It is up to the engineer to align the subscription and the control model
  • Christoph B: The standard is unclear whether the ctlModel is tied to services or the state machine
  • This topic was supposed to be covered by the Control Between Functions - this is a future topic

2. Timeout function at process level

  • Are XCBR.POS.sbotimeout and XCBR.POS.opertimeout in process level IEDs available if timeout functions are required at the process level?
  • IEC 61850-7-3 Ed.2.1 states that the condition for the presence of sbotimeout and opertimeout is "MOsbo: Element is mandatory if declared control model supports 'sbo-with-normal-security' or 'sbo-with-enhanced-security', otherwise optional and value is of no impact."
  • What does "declared control model supports…" mean?
  • For example, if the MU supports the SBO control model via MMS, but control is performed via GOOSE messages, are XCBR.POS.sbotimeout and XCBR.POS.opertimeout mandatory and valid?
  • Thierry: Because MMS is supported, these attributes are required per the standard, even if you don't use it
  • J.S.: Tricky is only supporting GOOSE
  • Thierry: Only required if MMS is included. Otherwise, they are optional. You can use them for GOOSE if you want.
  • Camille: It is unclear if MOsbo applies to only MMS or any type of control
  • Linked to the first issue, Control between functions
  • Need to fix the presence condition statement where it says "optional and of no impact", this is not correct
  • sbotimeout and opertimeout are relevant for GOOSE messages

Also available in: Atom PDF