Project

General

Profile

Issues #6455

sSvs4 test case in TP1.2 needs further udpate after #5130, PIXIT entry Svs3 needs update as well

Added by Hua Qin 10 months ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Due date:
08/22/2023
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
9-2
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sSvs4
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

test case sSvs4 needs further update to harmonize with sGos6 to make the test description clearer.

1:
#5130 harmonize the test case sSvs4 to align with sGos6 but the text is not clear enough. For example, the test description starts with only configuring one stream but step 4 to 7 indicates that it subscribe to two streams.

2:
Also PIXIT Svs3 shall be updated - the preferred rate, the simulation check is mandatory, so there is no N in it.

3: For backwards compatible SV subscription, simulation check is not mandatory.
So what is the behavior of the DUT when there are two same streams with only simulation bit different?
Do we only need to check the behavior of backwards compatible SV subscription when simulation is checked?

Suggest to update test case sSvs4/PIXIT Svs3 according to the attached document.
Also


Files

Proposed_sSvs4.docx Proposed_sSvs4.docx 25.1 KB Hua Qin, 06/30/2023 03:43 AM
Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4.docx Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4.docx 25.7 KB Richard Schimmel, 07/26/2023 04:34 AM
Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4 (August8).docx Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4 (August8).docx 24.5 KB Richard Schimmel, 08/09/2023 04:22 AM
#1

Updated by Hua Qin 10 months ago

Hua Qin wrote:

test case sSvs4 needs further update to harmonize with sGos6 to make the test description clearer.

1:
#5130 harmonize the test case sSvs4 to align with sGos6 but the text is not clear enough. For example, the test description starts with only configuring one stream but step 4 to 7 indicates that it subscribe to two streams.

2:
Also PIXIT Svs3 shall be updated - the preferred rate, the simulation check is mandatory, so there is no N in it.

3: For backwards compatible SV subscription, simulation check is not mandatory.
So what is the behavior of the DUT when there are two same streams with only simulation bit different?
Do we only need to check the behavior of backwards compatible SV subscription when simulation is checked?

Suggest to update test case sSvs4/PIXIT Svs3 according to the attached document.

#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 10 months ago

  • Due date set to 07/25/2023
  • Status changed from New to In Progress

PIXIT sVs3 entry to be deprecated. All devices shall support Sim SV.

Richard and Sarah to update solution.

#3

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 9 months ago

  • Due date changed from 07/25/2023 to 08/08/2023
#4

Updated by Richard Schimmel 9 months ago

  • Project changed from Test Procedure Issues to Server
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
  • Closed Reason --Not Set--- added
#5

Updated by Richard Schimmel 9 months ago

Updated the solution attached (reviewed by Sarah)

#6

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 9 months ago

  • Due date changed from 08/08/2023 to 08/22/2023

Expected result step 6 to add: no change in LSVS1.sT and LSVS1.simSt

Add conditional for devices that only support one stream.

#7

Updated by Richard Schimmel 9 months ago

Added "when supported" and updated expected result on step 6

#8

Updated by Joel Greene 8 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

Accepted.

#9

Updated by Richard Schimmel about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Updated Test Document set to TP1.3

Also available in: Atom PDF