Issues #6455: sSvs4 test case in TP1.2 needs further udpate after #5130, PIXIT entry Svs3 needs update as well - Server - UCAIug Issue Tracking System

Issues #6455

sSvs4 test case in TP1.2 needs further udpate after #5130, PIXIT entry Svs3 needs update as well

Added by Hua Qin over 1 year ago. Updated 9 months ago.

Status:

Closed

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Due date:

08/22/2023

Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:

Clause Reference:

61850 Standard:

9-2

Triggering Tissue:

Final Decision:

Initial Test Document:

Updated Test Document:

TP1.3

Test Case ID:

sSvs4

Closed Reason:

--Not Set---

Triggering Tissue 2:

Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

test case sSvs4 needs further update to harmonize with sGos6 to make the test description clearer.

1:
#5130 harmonize the test case sSvs4 to align with sGos6 but the text is not clear enough. For example, the test description starts with only configuring one stream but step 4 to 7 indicates that it subscribe to two streams.

2:
Also PIXIT Svs3 shall be updated - the preferred rate, the simulation check is mandatory, so there is no N in it.

3: For backwards compatible SV subscription, simulation check is not mandatory.
So what is the behavior of the DUT when there are two same streams with only simulation bit different?
Do we only need to check the behavior of backwards compatible SV subscription when simulation is checked?

Suggest to update test case sSvs4/PIXIT Svs3 according to the attached document.
Also

Files

Proposed_sSvs4.docx	Proposed_sSvs4.docx	25.1 KB	Hua Qin, 06/30/2023 03:43 AM
Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4.docx	Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4.docx	25.7 KB	Richard Schimmel, 07/26/2023 04:34 AM
Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4 (August8).docx	Solution to redmine 6455 sSvs4 (August8).docx	24.5 KB	Richard Schimmel, 08/09/2023 04:22 AM

Updated by Hua Qin over 1 year ago

Hua Qin wrote:

test case sSvs4 needs further update to harmonize with sGos6 to make the test description clearer.

1:
#5130 harmonize the test case sSvs4 to align with sGos6 but the text is not clear enough. For example, the test description starts with only configuring one stream but step 4 to 7 indicates that it subscribe to two streams.

2:
Also PIXIT Svs3 shall be updated - the preferred rate, the simulation check is mandatory, so there is no N in it.

3: For backwards compatible SV subscription, simulation check is not mandatory.
So what is the behavior of the DUT when there are two same streams with only simulation bit different?
Do we only need to check the behavior of backwards compatible SV subscription when simulation is checked?

Suggest to update test case sSvs4/PIXIT Svs3 according to the attached document.