Feature #6218
Parameters not available in standardized LN - PhyConnITF
0%
Clarification from RTE is needed, If the goal is to indicate the type of interface, Communication section could be used to model this interface
IEC 61850-7-4
Description
New parametres need to be modelled since they are not available in standard LNs.
This issue refer to PhyConnITF parameter, as explained in the attached documents by RTE.
Files
Proposal descriptions
Last WG10 comment: Clarification from RTE is needed, If the goal is to indicate the type of interface, Communication section could be used to model this interface
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Copied from Feature #6217: Parameters not available in standardized LN - NamAccRtg added
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
WG10 comment:
PhyConnITF: Clarification from RTE is needed, If the goal is to indicate the type of interface, Communication section could be used to model this interface.
RTE comment:
The use case is to express the communication interface of line differential protections. It is true that this communication interface could be expressed in the communication part,
but in this case it is not clear which SubNetwork protocol type should be used (enumeration restricted to IP, 8-MMS, and physical), if the communication interface is not an IP type.
To be clarified by the TF: should proprietary communication between IEDs at the 2 ends of the line be expressed as AP?
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- Copied to Feature #6219: Parameters not available in standardized LN - VRtg, ARtg and HzRtg added
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago
- ID changed from 19 to 53
- TF Unique ID changed from 19 # RTE to 53 # RTE
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 1 year ago
It is concluded that issue has to be presented and discussed on next joint meeting of TC57 & TC38 & TC95 in Lyon (May 25th, 2023). Will be presented by Maud Merley.