Improvement #618
Evolution of DO SumSqA of LN SPTRExt
Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago.
Updated 12 months ago.
Category:
Standard clarification required
Due date:
04/23/2021 (over 2 years late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Short Proposal:
90-3 to address it. To check if SumSqA is resettable.
Needs More Information:
No
Description
The 90-3 proposes a DO SumSqA in the LN destined for surveillance of the power TR. We should expect to have a status DO here, and not a control DO (here it is an APC type).
RTE is expecting this information to exist as supervision status.
Proposal descriptions
Proposal:
RTE to describe use-case and usage of this supervision status.
To be submitted to 90-3 TF.
If information from the supervision of CBR is sufficient, Issue will be closed.
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Short Proposal set to 90-3 to address it. To check if SumSqA is resettable.
- Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-90-3
- Start date changed from 10/07/2020 to 10/23/2020
- Status changed from In Progress to Triage
- To discuss in WG10 set to No
Check if SumSqA is resettable before putting this issue in progress
- Due date set to 04/23/2021
- Category changed from Standard extension required to Standard clarification required
- Assignee set to Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo
2021-03-02: Carlos to check with 90-3 editor (Alexander Winterer) if this DO is resettable or not, in order to see if the definition as APC is correct.
Proposal to set the status to "In progress" as there is no information expected from RTE (issuer of the issue) ?
- Status changed from Triage to In Progress
Maud Merley wrote in #note-5:
Proposal to set the status to "In progress" as there is no information expected from RTE (issuer of the issue) ?
Done.
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from In Progress to Triage
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- Status changed from Triage to Resolved
- Needs More Information set to No
Also available in: Atom
PDF