Project

General

Profile

Improvement #618

Evolution of DO SumSqA of LN SPTRExt

Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
Triage
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
10/23/2020
Due date:
04/23/2021 (about 16 months late)
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
14
Source:
RTE
TF Unique ID:
14 # RTE
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

90-3 to address it. To check if SumSqA is resettable.

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-90-3


Description

The 90-3 proposes a DO SumSqA in the LN destined for surveillance of the power TR. We should expect to have a status DO here, and not a control DO (here it is an APC type).
RTE is expecting this information to exist as supervision status.


Proposal descriptions

Proposal:
RTE to describe use-case and usage of this supervision status.
To be submitted to 90-3 TF.
If information from the supervision of CBR is sufficient, Issue will be closed.

#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Short Proposal set to 90-3 to address it. To check if SumSqA is resettable.
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-90-3
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Start date changed from 10/07/2020 to 10/23/2020
#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Triage
  • To discuss in WG10 set to No

Check if SumSqA is resettable before putting this issue in progress

#4

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 1 year ago

  • Due date set to 04/23/2021
  • Category changed from Standard extension required to Standard clarification required
  • Assignee set to Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo

2021-03-02: Carlos to check with 90-3 editor (Alexander Winterer) if this DO is resettable or not, in order to see if the definition as APC is correct.

#5

Updated by Maud Merley 2 months ago

Proposal to set the status to "In progress" as there is no information expected from RTE (issuer of the issue) ?

#6

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 2 months ago

  • Status changed from Triage to In Progress
#7

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 2 months ago

Maud Merley wrote in #note-5:

Proposal to set the status to "In progress" as there is no information expected from RTE (issuer of the issue) ?

Done.

#8

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 2 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from In Progress to Triage
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
#9

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 months ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No

Also available in: Atom PDF