Project

General

Profile

Issues #6174

Amend sCtl7 to test both interlocking check and check synchronizing ?

Added by Michael Haecker 3 months ago. Updated 4 days ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Due date:
02/07/2023 (Due in 11 days)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

The title for sCtl7 is „Checks conditions“, so valid for both interlock check and synchronism check. The behaviour on synchronism check is testable as well, so why not testing it?

We would not need to rename sCtl7, we could add further steps 4, 5 und 6 in "light mode" stating that they are to be executed similar to steps 1 to 3:

"
If interlock check is supported, then execute steps 1 to 3.
If synchronism check is supported, then execute steps 4 to 6 like steps 1 to 3 applying „Check Synchrocheck“ and „Blocked-by-synchrocheck” instead.
"

#1

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 2 months ago

This is complicated to test - requires additional equipment, etc.

#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 18 days ago

Discuss further when Richard is available.

#3

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 4 days ago

  • Project changed from IEC 61850 TPWG to Server
  • Due date set to 02/07/2023
  • Assignee changed from Joel Greene to Richard Schimmel
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
  • Closed Reason --Not Set--- added

Also available in: Atom PDF