Project

General

Profile

Improvement #610

Mapping of another phases system description to the generic phases phsA, phsB, phsC

Added by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago. Updated 12 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
10/07/2020
Due date:
04/07/2021 (over 3 years late)
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
2
Source:
RTE
TF Unique ID:
2 # RTE
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
IEC 61850-6 edition 3
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:

To include the definition in Substation->VoltageLevel section

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:

Description

Example : how to map system 0-4-8 or 3-7-11 to phsA-phsB-phsC.
Helpful for maintenance and exploitation of the system.

Files

20210326-RTE Use cases - 610.docx 20210326-RTE Use cases - 610.docx 16.7 KB Use case explanation Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo, 05/11/2021 10:13 AM

Proposal descriptions

To be discussed inside WG10 in tems of evolution to edition 3.

Related issues

Copied to IEC TC57 WG10 Future Work - WG10 Future Work #5939: Mapping of another phases system description to the generic phases phsA, phsB, phsCNew10/07/2020

Actions
#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
  • Short Proposal set to Is related to configuration description/documentation or online data model? RTE to give us more information

Is related to configuration description/documentation or online data model? RTE to give us more information

#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Start date changed from 10/08/2020 to 10/07/2020
#4

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Triage
#5

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago

  • Due date set to 04/07/2021
  • To discuss in WG10 set to No

2021-03-02: RTE will provide an use case by end of month. RTE confirms is required for configuration purposes, not online data model.
There are several posibilities, depending on the use case we will find the best one. Using valKind=spec, a data attribute of a data object with CF constraint will not appear in the online data model. Another option is to extend SCL definition with a new attribute in voltage level definition. This option needs to have substation section in SCL.

#6

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Triage to Resolved
  • Short Proposal changed from Is related to configuration description/documentation or online data model? RTE to give us more information to To include the definition in Substation->VoltageLevel section
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6
  • Estimated Completion set to IEC 61850-6 edition 3
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)

2021-05-11: Substation -> VoltageLevel could be used to represent the identification of the phases.

#8

Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 1 year ago

  • Copied to WG10 Future Work #5939: Mapping of another phases system description to the generic phases phsA, phsB, phsC added
#9

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 12 months ago

  • Needs More Information set to No

Also available in: Atom PDF