Improvement #610
Mapping of another phases system description to the generic phases phsA, phsB, phsC
0%
To include the definition in Substation->VoltageLevel section
IEC 61850-6
Description
Example : how to map system 0-4-8 or 3-7-11 to phsA-phsB-phsC.
Helpful for maintenance and exploitation of the system.
Files
Proposal descriptions
To be discussed inside WG10 in tems of evolution to edition 3.
Related issues
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Short Proposal set to Is related to configuration description/documentation or online data model? RTE to give us more information
Is related to configuration description/documentation or online data model? RTE to give us more information
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Start date changed from 10/08/2020 to 10/07/2020
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Triage
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Due date set to 04/07/2021
- To discuss in WG10 set to No
2021-03-02: RTE will provide an use case by end of month. RTE confirms is required for configuration purposes, not online data model.
There are several posibilities, depending on the use case we will find the best one. Using valKind=spec, a data attribute of a data object with CF constraint will not appear in the online data model. Another option is to extend SCL definition with a new attribute in voltage level definition. This option needs to have substation section in SCL.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Triage to Resolved
- Short Proposal changed from Is related to configuration description/documentation or online data model? RTE to give us more information to To include the definition in Substation->VoltageLevel section
- Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6
- Estimated Completion set to IEC 61850-6 edition 3
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
2021-05-11: Substation -> VoltageLevel could be used to represent the identification of the phases.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 3 years ago
Updated by Vladan Cvejic over 2 years ago
- Copied to WG10 Future Work #5939: Mapping of another phases system description to the generic phases phsA, phsB, phsC added