Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #5295

Joint issue on ACLineSegment physical modeling clarification

Added by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Solution Version:
Breaking Change:
Yes
Breaking Change Description:
WirePhaseInfo and WireUsageKind classes deleted, 2 classes renamed, 4 attributes deprecated, 4 associations deleted
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13, WG14
Requestor:
Pat Brown
Standard(s):

61968-11, 61968-4, 61970-301, 61968-13

Version:
iec61970cim18v01_iec61968cim14v00_iec62325cim04v08_CIM101.0
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

The publication of Edition 2 of 61968-13 resulted in an overabundance of options and a dearth of clarity related to the definition of wire assemblies for ACLineSegments.

Files

trash file but can_t delete trash file but can_t delete 1.25 MB Pat Brown, 01/29/2022 03:53 PM
2021-11-29 Device Datasheet ACLineSegment requested UML updates.docx 2021-11-29 Device Datasheet ACLineSegment requested UML updates.docx 1.24 MB ACLineSegment wire assembly cleanup changes Pat Brown, 01/29/2022 05:57 PM
2022-01-30 Device Datasheet ACLineSegment requested UML updates.docx 2022-01-30 Device Datasheet ACLineSegment requested UML updates.docx 2.44 MB Pat Brown, 01/30/2022 02:49 AM

Release Notes

See attached 2022-01-30 Device Datasheet ACLineSegment requested UML updates.docx.

Related issues

Related to WG13 Issues - CIM Issues #5298: 5295:5298 61970 PhaseImpedanceData cleanup for ACLineSegment physical modelingClosedActions
Related to WG14 Issues - CIM Issues #5297: 5295:5297 61968 AssetInfo cleanup for ACLineSegment physical modelingOpenActions
#1

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

#2

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

  • Release Notes updated (diff)
#3

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

Pat Brown wrote:

The publication of Edition 2 of 61968-13 resulted in an overabundance of options and a dearth of clarity related to the definition of wire assemblies for ACLineSegments.

#5

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
#6

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

  • Project changed from CIM Joint Issues to WG13 Issues
  • Proposed Solution updated (diff)
#7

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

  • Project changed from WG13 Issues to CIM Joint Issues
  • Description updated (diff)
  • Proposed Solution updated (diff)
#8

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

  • Standard(s) changed from 61968-11, 61968-13, 61970-301 to 61968-11, 61968-4, 61968-13, 61970-301
#9

Updated by Pat Brown almost 3 years ago

  • Standard(s) changed from 61968-11, 61968-4, 61968-13, 61970-301 to 61968-11, 61968-4, 61970-301, 61968-13
#10

Updated by Chuck DuBose about 2 years ago

  • Related to CIM Issues #5298: 5295:5298 61970 PhaseImpedanceData cleanup for ACLineSegment physical modeling added
#11

Updated by Chuck DuBose about 2 years ago

  • Related to CIM Issues #5297: 5295:5297 61968 AssetInfo cleanup for ACLineSegment physical modeling added
#12

Updated by Eric Stephan almost 2 years ago

AI: 61968-4 team to meet and develop proposal.

#13

Updated by Eric Stephan almost 2 years ago

Discussion is needed:
1) If the new ConductingInfo class on the 61968 should be be used by the 61970 modeling?
2) Should the WireAssembly WirePosition and InterfaceSpacing Classes exist in the 61970 or 61968?
3) If bullet 1 answer is Yes then we need to consider moving the association currently between WireInfo and WirePosition to parent class ConductingInfo and WirePosition. (should we explicitly retain WireInfo and WirePosition association AND add association between ConductingInfo and WirePosition to maintain backwards compatibility?).

Discussion Participants:  Judy Morgan, Pat Brown, Chuck DuBose, Shawn Hu.
#14

Updated by Chavdar Ivanov over 1 year ago

Agreement: 13 Jun 2023, Oslo
- IntraphaseSpacing (WireBundle), WirePosition, WireAssembly should move to 61970
- the changes described in the Word document should be implemented in CIM18
- we keep the name WireBundle instead of renaming it IntraphaseSpacing

Changes to be implemented.

Also available in: Atom PDF