Issues #1793
sGos22 - comment does not match expected result
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Due date:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
IEC 61850-7-1 Annex K2.17
61850 Standard:
7-1
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
See attachement
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sGos22
Closed Reason:
Test Procedure Update
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:
Description
The expected result is that the DUT subscribed to not only the Ed2 SPS but also to the Future edition SPC stVal!
Update the last line in the comment to:
Configure DUT to subscribe to the normal Ed2 Ind1.ST.stVal and Ind2.ST.stVal as well as FutInd1.ST.stVal and FutInd2.ST.stVal
Files
Updated by Richard Schimmel over 1 year ago
- File Solution to redmine_1793_sGos22.docx Solution to redmine_1793_sGos22.docx added
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Added the attachment with the proposed sentence in the comment section.
Updated by Thierry Dufaure over 1 year ago
I agree with Richard. Future Data Object FutInd1 and FutInd2 need to be subscribed in oder to verify the forward compatiblity rules exposed in 7-1 Ed2.1.
Maybe replace "Normal Ed2 SPS" with "Standardized SPS DataObject".
Updated by Richard Schimmel over 1 year ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Final Decision set to See attachement
TPWG agreement resolve
Updated by Richard Schimmel over 1 year ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Initial Test Document changed from Amd1 Tp1.0 to Ed2Amd1 TP1.0
- Updated Test Document set to Ed2Amd1 TP1.1
- Closed Reason Test Procedure Update added
- Closed Reason deleted (
--Not Set---)