Project

General

Profile

Issues #6990

sSvp9 step 4 PTP class not 6/7 with/without holdover time?

Added by Richard Schimmel 3 months ago. Updated 12 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Due date:
12/10/2024 (11 days late)
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Clause Reference:
61850 Standard:
9-2
Triggering Tissue:
Final Decision:
Initial Test Document:
Updated Test Document:
Test Case ID:
sSvp14
Closed Reason:
--Not Set---
Triggering Tissue 2:
Triggering Tissue 3:

Description

IEEE 1588 defines clock class 6-7-52-187. When the master clock looses the GPS signal the master will continue. After a while the master clock will have clock class 7 and then 52 and then 187. When should the MU set the SmpSynch=1? Should it do immediately after clock 52 is received? May/Shall it wait it's own holdover time?
IEC 61869-9 is not that clear on this.

Proposal to add the holdover time:
4. Force the global PTP master to local (clockClass not 6 and not 7) by for example disconnecting the GPS antenna, then wait the holdover time (TVTR/TCTR.HoldTmms) plus 30 seconds

#1

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 3 months ago

  • Due date set to 10/29/2024
  • Assignee set to Richard Schimmel

Needs further review. TVTR/TCTR.HoldTmms applies when PTP messages are not available.

#2

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 2 months ago

  • Due date changed from 10/29/2024 to 11/12/2024

SEL to provide input. Thierry believes that the MU holdover is not of relevance as clock master is where the signal is lost.

#3

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
#4

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG about 1 month ago

  • Due date changed from 11/12/2024 to 12/10/2024

Tissues needed against 9-3, 61869-9

For the moment, PIXIT to describe the conditions to cause device to change smpSync

#5

Updated by IEC 61850 TPWG 12 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

When clock class = 187 MU shall set smpSync = 1 (value 52 to be deprecated). No holdover applies as clock signal is being received.

Ed2 of 61869-9 will clarify much of this. In the interim, this is the expected behavior.

Also available in: Atom PDF