Project

General

Profile

Feature #677

Impact of IEC 61869-13 (SAMU)

Added by Maud Merley about 1 year ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Start date:
05/21/2021
Due date:
11/21/2021 (about 9 months late)
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
50
Source:
RTE
TF Unique ID:
50 # RTE
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Yes
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-4


Description

Some DO might be added to LN TCTR and TVTR when IEC 61869-13 will be published.
How to identify and anticipate this ?


Proposal descriptions

1. What kind of extension is it?
2. Ask C.B. about the link between 61850 and 61869 (TC57 and TC38), who is working in the liason, and how to keep coordination with UF. (Dustin Tessier recommended himself to be liaison between TC57 and TC38.)

#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 11 months ago

  • Due date set to 11/21/2021
  • ID set to 50
  • TF Unique ID set to 50 # RTE
#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 11 months ago

TF Unique ID set

#4

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 9 months ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)

UF - IEC 61869-13 should nominate a data model manager to work with UML task force if they need to propose new DOs in 7-4 logical nodes?
IEC 61869-13 is proposing Rat DO in TCTR in TVTR to move to Mandatory.
There is an extension in 61869-9 for TCTR and TVTR, so they should coordinate between them.
So, it is some kind of profiling, not a modification.
We need someone from TC38 to know how they coordinate between different parts.
IEC 61869-9 comes from IEC 61850-9-2 Edition 2.
The proposal is how to work with TC65 in order to anticipate this situation?

#5

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 2 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
  • To discuss in WG10 changed from No to Yes
  • Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-7-4
#6

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 months ago

  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)

Also available in: Atom PDF