Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #6702

Grid Package: PhaseImpedanceData to support electrical parameters templates

Added by Celso Rocha 11 months ago. Updated 21 days ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Celso Rocha
Base Release:
Solution to be Applied To:
CIM18v10
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
61970-Wires
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13, WG14
Requestor:
Standard(s):

61970-301

Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

In #5298, PhaseImpedanceData.fromPhase and PhaseImpedanceData.toPhase attributes have been removed. However, there is a use case for keeping those attributes, that is the use of line templates with electrical parameters. This is somewhat common on the distribution space. For example, find attached a screenshot of an Unbalanced line template in CYME where the entries of the matrix are specified using phases.


Files


Proposed Solution

(Re)add PhaseImpedanceData.fromPhase and PhaseImpedanceData.toPhase attributes and update the description of PhaseImpedanceData class accordingly.


Decision

19-Sep-2024 Joint TF Hybrid Meetings:

After discussing it is clear that we will need Celso to sound off with an explanation as to why the row and column cannot be used (i.e. the original reason we removed from/to is due to the many different approaches to exchanging this data. We moved to remove them to reduce the number of options)

#1

Updated by Todd Viegut 11 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Open
  • Author/Contact Info set to Celso Rocha
  • Solution to be Applied To set to CIM18v10
  • CIM Impacted Groups WG14 added
#2

Updated by Todd Viegut 3 months ago

  • Decision updated (diff)
#3

Updated by Chavdar Ivanov 21 days ago

  • Status changed from Open to In Progress
#4

Updated by Todd Viegut 21 days ago

Celso, Chavdar and I added back in the attributes. However, the description will need your help to define. The issue is that we can not restore the old description at the Class level as it original was. This is due to reworking the class description for a separate Redmine Issue. Please review and touch base with us.

Also available in: Atom PDF