Project

General

Profile

WG10 Future Work #6579

How to add utility process name to DOs

Added by Vladan Cvejic 4 months ago. Updated 10 days ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
High
Assignee:
-
Start date:
11/07/2023
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Source:
Vattenfall
TF Unique ID:
2 # Vattenfall
WG10 Proposal:

19-01-23: Camille to distribute proposal for review (if accepted, will be implemented in next Revision/Ed)

Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
Short Proposal:

To use nsdoc files as holders of DO,DA standard descriptions (7-4, 7-3)If DO descriptions are to be changed, that should be done in SCL.

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
Yes
Assigned TF:
61850-6
Target edition:
Next

Description

Currently SCL has poor support for handling gateway/RTU-funktions where signal names are translated for remote communication. The specified sigal has a utility process name independent of used protcol. E.g. "start of distance protection". This needs to be associated with its IEC 61850 implementation (xxPDIS1.Str.general, xxPDIS2.Str.general etc.). The 80-1 part describes how 104 addresses can be added to SCL but also other utility fields are important to be able to include in SCL for specification and documentation purposes. Desired solution by Vattenfall is to have vendors use DA description to add utility process name.


Files

Vattenfall-Issue2-proposal_v3.docx Vattenfall-Issue2-proposal_v3.docx 15.8 KB Camille Bloch, 11/07/2023 08:33 AM

Related issues

Copied from IEC 61850 User Feedback Task Force - Bug #439: How to add utility process name to DOsResolved

Actions
#1

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 4 months ago

  • Copied from Bug #439: How to add utility process name to DOs added
#2

Updated by Vladan Cvejic 22 days ago

  • Target edition changed from Not assigned to Next
  • Assigned TF 61850-6 added
#3

Updated by Camille Bloch 10 days ago

In 61850-6 edition 2 AMD 2, a definition of Labels is added to support this requirement

Also available in: Atom PDF