Support #613
Clarification of representation of tap changer (LN ATTC, YLTC).
0%
1. TapOpR and TapOpL are for control by GOOSE 2. TapChg/TapPos.valWTr has the transient indication. TapChg/TapPos.valWTr will be updated with transient indication even if the command has been executed with control by GOOSE or by any other means. RTE will provide more information from the use case with the people originating the issue.
IEC 61850-7-4
Description
1.The semantic of TapOpL et TapOpR (ATCC) is not clear between status and control objects. In IEC61850-7-3, it is mentionned "The command is received ('opRcvd') by the IED as a control service or as a GOOSE message with a data object semantic resulting in a change of the controllable object (e.g. CSWI.OpOpn/OpCls, CPOW.OpOpn/OpCls, PTRC.Tr, RREC.OpCls, RBRF.OpEx, ATCC.TapOpR/TapOpL, SIMG.InsTr, ...)." or ATCC.TapOpR/TapOpL are status DO (SPS).
2. There is no DO in YLTC to indicate that the position is being changed.
1. Risk of misunderstanding.
2. Helpful for maintenance and exploitation of the system.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Short Proposal set to 1. TapOpR and TapOpL are for control by GOOSE 2. TapChg/TapPos.valWTr has the transient indication. TapChg/TapPos.valWTr will be updated with transient indication even if the command has been executed with control by GOOSE or by any other means. RTE will provide more information from the use case with the people originating the issue.
1. TapOpR and TapOpL are for control by GOOSE
2. TapChg/TapPos.valWTr has the transient indication. TapChg/TapPos.valWTr will be updated with transient indication even if the command has been executed with control by GOOSE or by any other means.
RTE will provide more information from the use case with the people originating the issue.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Start date changed from 10/07/2020 to 10/23/2020
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Triage
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 3 years ago
- To discuss in WG10 set to No
2021-03-02: We need answer from RTE
Updated by Maud Merley about 3 years ago
The clarification elements provided by the TF answer RTE question.
The issue could be closed.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago
- Status changed from Triage to Closed
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No