Project

General

Profile

Feature #557

Lockout functionality: how to model by different protection functions?

Added by Herbert Falk almost 4 years ago. Updated almost 4 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
29
Source:
ENTSO-E
TF Unique ID:
29 # ENTSO-E
WG10 Proposal:

This use case will be sent to 90-25 TF to take it into account

Estimated Completion:
19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (Vladan C) To send for comments to H31.19-06-06: Finished
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
Short Proposal:

In XCBR there is a Blkopen and Blkclose. Question is if it is sufficient to control these trough engineering or we need a new LN in order to control it automatically through this LN. This LN would handle as wel the reset. Proposition is to create a new LN in order create the most flexible solution and create the necessary signals/alarms for the scadaTo create new LN in protection domain19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)19-06-06: Use case presented and accepted. PTRC.Tr could be persistent or not, use case will be updated.

Standard(s):

IEC 61850-7-4

Needs More Information:
Assigned TF:

Description

Lockout: How should we model lock out by protection functions?
• Lock out by breaker failure
• Lock out by transformer protection
• Lock out by cable differential protection


Related issues

Related to 61850-7-5 and 61850-7-500 - IEC61850-7-5 #6559: Modelling of a Lockout/trip seal-in relayNew10/26/2023

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF