Feature #557
Lockout functionality: how to model by different protection functions?
0%
This use case will be sent to 90-25 TF to take it into account
In XCBR there is a Blkopen and Blkclose. Question is if it is sufficient to control these trough engineering or we need a new LN in order to control it automatically through this LN. This LN would handle as wel the reset. Proposition is to create a new LN in order create the most flexible solution and create the necessary signals/alarms for the scadaTo create new LN in protection domain19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)19-06-06: Use case presented and accepted. PTRC.Tr could be persistent or not, use case will be updated.
IEC 61850-7-4
Description
Lockout: How should we model lock out by protection functions?
• Lock out by breaker failure
• Lock out by transformer protection
• Lock out by cable differential protection
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from Lockout: How should we model lock out by protection functions? • Lock out by breaker failure • Lock out by transformer protectio to Lockout functionality: how to model by different protection functions
- Short Proposal changed from In XCBR there is a Blkopen and Blkclose. Question is if it is sufficient to control these trough engineering or we need a new LN in order to control it automatically through this LN. This LN would handle as wel the reset. Proposition is to create a new LN in order create the most flexible solution and create the necessary signals/alarms for the scada To create new LN in protection domain 19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done) 19-06-06: Use case presented and accepted. PTRC.Tr could be persistent or not, use case will be updated. to In XCBR there is a Blkopen and Blkclose. Question is if it is sufficient to control these trough engineering or we need a new LN in order to control it automatically through this LN. This LN would handle as wel the reset. Proposition is to create a new LN in order create the most flexible solution and create the necessary signals/alarms for the scadaTo create new LN in protection domain19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (V.Cvejic) To be addressed by TF 7-5 (approval and deffinition what has to be done)19-06-06: Use case presented and accepted. PTRC.Tr could be persistent or not, use case will be updated.
- Estimated Completion changed from 19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (Vladan C) To send for comments to H31. 19-06-06: Finished to 19-01-23: To create Use-case with different scenarios in order to clearly define scope of application (Vladan C) To send for comments to H31.19-06-06: Finished
Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from Lockout functionality: how to model by different protection functions to Lockout functionality: how to model by different protection functions?
- Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-7-4
- WG10 Proposal changed from This use case will be sent to 90-25 TF to take it into account. to This use case will be sent to 90-25 TF to take it into account
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to No
Checking done.