Project

General

Profile

Feature #5331

Multiple LNodes implemented by same LN

Added by Camille Bloch about 2 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Standard extension required
Start date:
03/26/2022
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
Source:
SCL IOP 2021
TF Unique ID:
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:

Description

From IOP discussions:
"When a specification defines multiple LNodes in the specification which are implemented by the same LN in a device, there is no standard way to represent this mapping. Part 6 is currently not clearly stating if multiple LNodes can be mapped to same LN or not

A good example for this need is the PTRC which could be define during specification into each protection function, and finally only one instance is defined in the protection device.

This could have an impact on functional naming if one LN implements multiple LNode"

But this is currently forbidden in part 6:
ยง9.2.6: "Therefore, the combination of iedName, ldInst, prefix, lnClass and lnInst shall be unique within all substation sections if iedName is not None."


Proposal descriptions

This problem is addressed in 90-30 (former 6-100) by changing cardinality and introducing LNodeSpecNaming.
To be implemented in Edition 3 of part 6.


Related issues

Copied to IEC TC57 WG10 Future Work - WG10 Future Work #5940: Multiple LNodes implemented by same LNClosed03/26/2022

Actions
#1

Updated by Vladan Cvejic about 2 years ago

  • Category set to Standard extension required
  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • Assignee set to Camille Bloch
  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
#2

Updated by Vladan Cvejic almost 2 years ago

#3

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Needs More Information set to No
#4

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
#5

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Proposal descriptions updated (diff)
#6

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No

Also available in: Atom PDF