Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #5108

PowerTransformerEnd

Added by Chavdar Ivanov over 2 years ago. Updated 6 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Chavdar Ivanov
Base Release:
Solution to be Applied To:
CIM18v03
Solution Version:
CIM18v03
Solution Applied By:
Chavdar Ivanov
Completion Date:
02/11/2023
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):

61970-301

Version:
Ed7
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
Origination ID:
Originally Assigned To:

Description

The description of the PowerTransformerEnd includes the following part which is ambiguous

1) for a two Terminal PowerTransformer the high voltage (TransformerEnd.endNumber=1) PowerTransformerEnd has non zero values on r, r0, x, and x0 while the low voltage (TransformerEnd.endNumber=2) PowerTransformerEnd has zero values for r, r0, x, and x0. Parameters are always provided, even if the PowerTransformerEnds have the same rated voltage. In this case, the parameters are provided at the PowerTransformerEnd which has TransformerEnd.endNumber equal to 1.

There are overlap of statements and also a statement that endNumber=1 winding "has non zero values on r, r0, x, and x0" which can be understood that if it is an issue if one of those values is zero. In addition the statement "Parameters are always provided" suggests that these parameters are required which is not the case


Proposed Solution

Proposal is to replace that part of the description with the following text

1) two PowerTransformerEnd-s shall be defined for a two Terminal PowerTransformer even if the two PowerTransformerEnd-s have the same rated voltage. The high voltage PowerTransformerEnd (TransformerEnd.endNumber=1) is the one used to exchange resistances (r, r0) and reactances (x, x0) of the PowerTransformer while the low voltage PowerTransformerEnd (TransformerEnd.endNumber=2) shall have zero impedance values , if provided .


Decision

UTF decided (Minneapolis meeting Sep 2022) to update the description
1) two PowerTransformerEnd-s shall be defined for a two Terminal PowerTransformer even if the two PowerTransformerEnd-s have the same rated voltage. The high voltage PowerTransformerEnd (TransformerEnd.endNumber=1) is the one used to exchange resistances (r, r0) and reactances (x, x0) of the PowerTransformer while the low voltage PowerTransformerEnd (TransformerEnd.endNumber=2) shall have zero impedance values


Release Notes

Part of the description of PowerTransformerEnd ws updated to
1) two PowerTransformerEnd-s shall be defined for a two Terminal PowerTransformer even if the two PowerTransformerEnd-s have the same rated voltage. The high voltage PowerTransformerEnd (TransformerEnd.endNumber=1) is the one used to exchange resistances (r, r0) and reactances (x, x0) of the PowerTransformer while the low voltage PowerTransformerEnd (TransformerEnd.endNumber=2) shall have zero impedance values.

#1

Updated by Yang Feng over 2 years ago

[Yang] The last sentence in the proposed context by Chavdar should be revised to "...shall have zero impedance values, if not provided."

#2

Updated by Eric Stephan over 1 year ago

  • Proposed Solution updated (diff)
#3

Updated by Eric Stephan over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to Open
#4

Updated by Eric Stephan over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Open to In Progress

9/22/2022 WG agreed to drop ", if provided" statement in Proposed Solution.

#5

Updated by Chavdar Ivanov about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
  • Solution Version set to CIM18v03
  • Solution Applied By set to Chavdar Ivanov
  • Completion Date set to 02/11/2023
  • Decision updated (diff)
  • Release Notes updated (diff)
#6

Updated by Todd Viegut 6 months ago

  • Solution to be Applied To changed from CIM18 to CIM18v03

Also available in: Atom PDF