Project

General

Profile

CIM Issues #4999

Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControlThe use cases fo

Added by Herbert Falk over 1 year ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Open
Priority:
Normal
Author/Contact Info:
Lars-Ola Osterlund
Base Release:
61970cim16v33
Solution to be Applied To:
Solution Version:
Solution Applied By:
Completion Date:
CIM Keywords:
Breaking Change:
No
Breaking Change Description:
CIM Impacted Groups:
WG13
Requestor:
Standard(s):
Version:
Clause:
Sub-Clause:
Paragraph:
Table:
Originally Closed in Version:
Origination Date:
07/12/2016
Origination ID:
13_253Cavtat1
Originally Assigned To:

Description

Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControl
The use cases for RegulatingControl need to be described as this has created confusion in ENTSO-E. In a node-breaker model it is possible to end up with the following situations
- one RegulatingControl with multiple RegulatingCondEq on a single TopologicalNode
- multiple RegulatingControls with a single RegulatingCondEq on a single TopologicalNode
- a mixture of the above two
Advice on how to select the controls for a mix of controlling devices is needed
- SynchronousMachines
- Tap changers
- Shunts


Proposed Solution

An approach is to state that it is up to the user to set enable and disable the controls to mirror the intended behaviour.

Assign to Control Function or Physical Devices Subgroups

#1

Updated by Eric Stephan over 1 year ago

  • Subject changed from Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControl The use cases fo to Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControlThe use cases fo
  • Origination ID changed from 13_253 Cavtat1 to 13_253Cavtat1
  • Decision updated (diff)
#2

Updated by Eric Stephan about 1 year ago

  • Proposed Solution updated (diff)
  • Decision updated (diff)

Also available in: Atom PDF