CIM Issues #4999: Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControlThe use cases fo - WG13 Issues - UCAIug Issue Tracking System

CIM Issues #4999

Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControlThe use cases fo

Added by Herbert Falk about 3 years ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:

Closed

Priority:

Normal

Author/Contact Info:

Lars-Ola Osterlund

Base Release:

61970cim16v33

Solution to be Applied To:

Solution Version:

Solution Applied By:

Completion Date:

CIM Keywords:

Breaking Change:

Breaking Change Description:

CIM Impacted Groups:

WG13

Requestor:

Standard(s):

Version:

Clause:

Sub-Clause:

Paragraph:

Table:

Originally Closed in Version:

Origination Date:

07/12/2016

Origination ID:

13_253Cavtat1

Originally Assigned To:

Description

Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControl
The use cases for RegulatingControl need to be described as this has created confusion in ENTSO-E. In a node-breaker model it is possible to end up with the following situations
- one RegulatingControl with multiple RegulatingCondEq on a single TopologicalNode
- multiple RegulatingControls with a single RegulatingCondEq on a single TopologicalNode
- a mixture of the above two
Advice on how to select the controls for a mix of controlling devices is needed
- SynchronousMachines
- Tap changers
- Shunts

Proposed Solution

An approach is to state that it is up to the user to set enable and disable the controls to mirror the intended behaviour.

Assign to Control Function or Physical Devices Subgroups

Decision

18-Sep-2024 Joint TF Hybrid Meeting - Minneapolis:
Reviewed and have agreed this should be closed. Addressed by the current amendments to controls in CIM18.

Updated by Eric Stephan about 3 years ago

Subject changed from Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControl The use cases fo to Use of RequaltingControl/TapChangerControlThe use cases fo
Origination ID changed from 13_253 Cavtat1 to 13_253Cavtat1
Decision updated (diff)