Improvement #441
Limitations of one to one mapping between LNode and LN
0%
to be adressed to the 61850-6-100 (need a realistic date)6-100 states that n:1 relationship between LNodes and LNs is allowed and supported. No need to change the SCL scheme for this.
Discussed with TF SCL function modelling.
IEC 61850-90-30
Description
The Standard requires a one to one mapping between LNode and LN. This creates serious limitations. Examples:
1. Let us assume vendor makes use of GGIO and represent a 32 bit BI/O Interface Card in the IED with the LN BIO32GGIO1. Now in my Substation section I define two Functions with Fun1/BIOGGIO1, Fun2/BIOGGIO2. Fun1 and Fun2 are two very different functions, but I have only one BIO card in my IED. Now I would like to map the LNode Fun1/BIOGGIO1 to LN BIO32GGIO1 and Fun2/BIOGGIO2 also to LN BIO32GGIO1. Naturally they use distinct Data Attributes.
2. It is easy to find a similar example for MMXU. Power Measurement and Current/ Voltage Measurement can be used in different Functions in the Single Line, but are using the same LN MMXU.
Files
| Captura.PNG | View Captura.PNG | 28.4 KB | Mapping LNode DOs to LN DOs when mapping is not direct from doName |
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo over 2 years ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to Improvement
- Subject changed from The Standard requires a one to one mapping between LNode and LN. This creates serious limitations. Examples: 1. Let us assume ve to Limitations of one to one mapping between LNode and LN
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Standard(s) set to IEC 61850-6-100
- WG10 Proposal changed from to be adressed to the 61850-6-100 (need a realistic date) 6-100 states that n:1 relationship between LNodes and LNs is allowed and supported. No need to change the SCL scheme for this. to to be adressed to the 61850-6-100 (need a realistic date)6-100 states that n:1 relationship between LNodes and LNs is allowed and supported. No need to change the SCL scheme for this.
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting set to Yes
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo about 1 year ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Estimated Completion changed from Ed 3 to Ed 1
- Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No
- To discuss in WG10 set to No
6-100 does not cover the issue completely. Relation LNode - LN is 1:1, but what it is possible is to map remaining DOs not covered by mapped LN to DOs of other LN.
Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 23 days ago
- Estimated Completion changed from Ed 1 to End of 2023
- Standard(s) changed from IEC 61850-6-100 to IEC 61850-90-30
- Needs More Information set to No