Project

General

Profile

Improvement #6803

In part 6, the reference of "pure client" LN by LNodes is not clear.

Added by Camille Bloch 7 months ago. Updated 3 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Standard clarification required
Start date:
06/06/2024
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
ID:
Source:
TF Unique ID:
WG10 Proposal:
Estimated Completion:
Discuss in Upcoming Meeting:
No
To discuss in WG10:
No
Short Proposal:
Standard(s):

IEC 61850-6

Needs More Information:
No
Assigned TF:
61850-6

Description

In Part 6, the LNode which refers to an implemented LN in a device have to define the iedName and the ldInst where the LN reside. But there is no rule regarding pure client LN which are not associated to a server, and so without LDevice.

This issue may have already been identified during virtual IOP in 2023 and this has to be check. The proposal was to have LD0 used as it is already done in ClientLN.

But this may be better to not express ldInst at all in this case.

This need to be discussed and take a decision before creating a tissue.

The proposal will be to allow an empty or not defined ldInst in LNode when iedName is set, which indicates taht the LN is a pure client

#1

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 5 months ago

  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from No to Yes
  • Assigned TF 61850-6 added
  • Assigned TF deleted (None)
#2

Updated by Carlos Rodriguez del Castillo 3 months ago

  • Category set to Standard clarification required
  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • Discuss in Upcoming Meeting changed from Yes to No

A clarification in the standard is needed since it is not clear to use LD0 for pure clients where no logical devices are defined.
It will be clarified in Ed3.
Move this issue to "Future improvement" database.

Also available in: Atom PDF